Talk:Non-Borel set

	NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
	WP article "Non-Borel set", version of 23 Aug 2008, was used. I am its sole author.
	Boris Tsirelson

Suggestion: Create "Related Articles" subpage

Hi, Boris. The only suggestion I have is that you should create the "Related Articles" subpage:

• When you click on the "Related Articles" tab just above, you will see the instructions on how to do it.

• As an example, you could look at Logarithm/Related Articles

Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. Milton Beychok 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

A question. The related articles are already linked from the article. Should they be linked again from "Related Articles"? And if you answer "yes" then I have another question: some of these are for now non-existent articles; should they also be included into "Related Articles"?

By the way, I am astonished to see "Elementary function" a subtopic of "Logarithm". Indeed, the logarithm is just one of the elementary functions; why "subtopic"? Boris Tsirelson 05:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Some remarks

I think it would be better to merge this with Borel set (which is not more than a stub). An article about Borel sets should also tell about non-Borel sets.

In my opinion (I do not know if this is a general opinion) this article does not need a link to "simple" topics like divisor, etc. It necessarily addresses readers who should know this.

The "Advanced" subpage only contains one sentence and a reference -- that could/should be moved to the article.

Peter Schmitt 00:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

About merge: in principle I agree, but for now the "Borel set" article is even shorter than this short one; the merge will create a ridiculous dis-balance.

About simple links: OK, I'll remove some.

About "Advanced": I guess that only a small fraction of readers acquainted with Borel sets are also acquainted with analytic sets and their universality. Maybe it is better not to frighten them? Boris Tsirelson 05:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)