Talk:Michele Bachmann: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Chris Day |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Related articles == | |||
I always wrestle with the placement of topics in the RA hierarchy. Two examples here; Tea Partiers and John McCain. Tea partiers could be a related topic and possibly even a parent topic depending on perspective. And wouldn't John McCain be a better fit as a related topic? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Oh, agreed. While I want to do an article (or subsection), I haven't even decided if "Tea Party" or "Tea Partier" is the preferred term. My thoughts are to start with an article [[restructuring of the U.S. political right]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Sounds good. I'm glad I'm not the only one in the [[twilight zone]]. I guess the links will settle into place over time. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 10 December 2009
|
| Metadata here |
Related articles
I always wrestle with the placement of topics in the RA hierarchy. Two examples here; Tea Partiers and John McCain. Tea partiers could be a related topic and possibly even a parent topic depending on perspective. And wouldn't John McCain be a better fit as a related topic? Chris Day 03:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, agreed. While I want to do an article (or subsection), I haven't even decided if "Tea Party" or "Tea Partier" is the preferred term. My thoughts are to start with an article restructuring of the U.S. political right. Howard C. Berkowitz 03:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I'm glad I'm not the only one in the twilight zone. I guess the links will settle into place over time. Chris Day 03:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)