Talk:History of Poland: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos (natural boundaries) |
imported>Richard Jensen (→Natural borders: controversy) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Well..? My suggestion would be either the past tense in [[Poland, history]] or some qualification of "no natural boundaries". Or just skipping the introductory sentence. But I'll leave it to the primary authors. [[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 09:12, 28 December 2007 (CST) | Well..? My suggestion would be either the past tense in [[Poland, history]] or some qualification of "no natural boundaries". Or just skipping the introductory sentence. But I'll leave it to the primary authors. [[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 09:12, 28 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::historically there were no "natural" boundaries. The maps show this. It was German East Prussia to the North that for a while was "part" of Poland. The article on Poland today is a bit more controversial. The Germans in East Prussia and in Silesia were all forcibly removed in 1945, and eastern Poland (as of 1920) was given to Ukraine. indeed the boundary was highly controversial until 1990. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 11:15, 28 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:15, 28 December 2007
|
| Metadata here |
If you've any problems with what I've done here, just move it back :-) Denis Cavanagh 10:20, 16 December 2007 (CST)
- it's a good move--thanks! I think the lower case h in history is better. Richard Jensen 07:24, 28 December 2007 (CST)
Natural borders
A quotation from Poland, "Poland is predominantly open plains, with the natural borders of the Carpathian Mountains to the south and the Baltic Sea to the north."
A quotation from Poland, history, "Poland has no natural boundaries, such as mountains or oceans, so..."
Well..? My suggestion would be either the past tense in Poland, history or some qualification of "no natural boundaries". Or just skipping the introductory sentence. But I'll leave it to the primary authors. Aleksander Stos 09:12, 28 December 2007 (CST)
- historically there were no "natural" boundaries. The maps show this. It was German East Prussia to the North that for a while was "part" of Poland. The article on Poland today is a bit more controversial. The Germans in East Prussia and in Silesia were all forcibly removed in 1945, and eastern Poland (as of 1920) was given to Ukraine. indeed the boundary was highly controversial until 1990. Richard Jensen 11:15, 28 December 2007 (CST)