Talk:Historiography

Citable Version ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: The study of historians and their methods and interpretive models. [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup category: History [Categories OK]
Subgroup category: Historiography
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: British English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - Bibliography - External Links - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Advanced - Recipes - Citable Version

See History

Beginning of article on Historiography. --Anthony.Sebastian 18:52, 17 May 2008 (CDT)

Historiography is fully covered at History, so I don't see much point in a separate article. The definition used here is not at all standard. Richard Jensen 19:13, 17 May 2008 (CDT)

Professor Jensen: I will not proceed further with developing this article. Wrote it to try to get a firm grip on the meaning(s) of the term 'historiography', on the distinctions among the senses of the term. I thought it might help readers who, like myself, do not really appreciate those distinctions, which distinctions I do not find explicitly described in History.

Will you point out where this description goes "not at all standard"?

I have also given some thought about a short piece on 'doxography', mostly definitional, not presently mentioned in CZ. Do you have thoughts about that? -Anthony.Sebastian 23:01, 17 May 2008 (CDT)

Talk:Historiography

Navigation menu

Search