Talk:Historic theaters of California: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 16: Line 16:


Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on [[California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters]].  Since we have instigated [[CZ:Subpages]] officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on [[California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters]].  Since we have instigated [[CZ:Subpages]] officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
Also, I disagree with Todd's point about the use of the comma in this sort of case.  History editor Richard Jensen uses commas in history articles; but before too much longer we'll be taking a Council vote on this (actually, a question we might vote on first is whether the History Workgroup can set its own policy on such issues). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:06, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:06, 18 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Historic theaters of California"
Workgroup category or categories Visual Arts Workgroup, History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Todd Coles 15:51, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





move

Perhaps this article would be better placed at California, Historic theaters or something similar. Most of our other articles seem to follow that format. --Todd Coles 15:53, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters. Since we have instigated CZ:Subpages officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --Larry Sanger 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Also, I disagree with Todd's point about the use of the comma in this sort of case. History editor Richard Jensen uses commas in history articles; but before too much longer we'll be taking a Council vote on this (actually, a question we might vote on first is whether the History Workgroup can set its own policy on such issues). --Larry Sanger 10:06, 18 September 2007 (CDT)