Talk:Harvard University: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→An historian vs. a historian: What does Google say about this?) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
==An historian vs. a historian== | ==An historian vs. a historian== | ||
Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better. I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side. | Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better. I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:51, 26 September 2007
An historian vs. a historian
Personally, I think "an" *sounds* better. I looked at the WP article on "An" and it's unclear where "historian" falls in this debate. There are arguments to be made for either side.
I then did a Google for "an historian" and found 734,000 hits, an impressive number. Just to be impartial, however, I then Googled "a historian" and found 1,810,000 hits.
So I guess we'll leave it as "a historian." :( Hayford Peirce 11:39, 1 July 2007 (CDT)