Talk:Gay (word): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Stephen Ewen
(→‎What this article is about, and sections removed: source for etymology of the term)
Line 24: Line 24:


I hope I've expressed my concerns, or at least my confusion, adequately... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 01:45, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
I hope I've expressed my concerns, or at least my confusion, adequately... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 01:45, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=gay seems to describe at least some of the etymology for "gay" very well.  —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 02:37, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:37, 28 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Gay (word)"
Workgroup category or categories Sociology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Ian Johnson 01:07, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I started this article from scratch here at Citizendium. --Ian Johnson 01:07, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

Original author notes

This article is part of a range of gay related articles I am in the process of creating at CZ.

There will be needed sources and relevant links added soon, and, potentially, topic section expansion - and I hope that other CZers will feel very welcome to join with me to help build this and other GLBT related articles. --Ian Johnson 01:07, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

What this article is about, and sections removed

Removed (tentatively) "Famous gay men" and "Gay media" as section headings. These topics don't belong under the title "gay," do they? Let me explain my thinking, which is a little complicated. "Homosexuality" is the name of a general phenomenon. There ought to be an article titled "gay," of course, but it is an adjective; therefore, it seems to me, any article about it should be mainly about semantic and other features of the word "gay." (We might move/redirect the article to gay (word).) An article that has sections about famous gay men (which might be better made a subpage, eh?) and gay media should would concern not the word but the thing, hence something that goes under a substantive noun: "gayness" or (better, perhaps) "homosexuality." But then, an article about homosexuality might (I don't know, really) be best focused on "the thing itself," whatever that amounts to, while we have another article about gays in society (whatever that might be called). Consider: we'll have an article about blindness (please don't read too much into the analogy!!); should we have information about famous blind people and blind media within the article about blindness itself? Maybe, maybe not. We might want to have the blind in society or social aspects of blindness or some such thing. If, in both the case of homosexuality and blindness, we want all-encompassing articles that concern both biological/health aspects and societal aspects (and all other aspects), then where exactly should they live, and will we plan to have articles about just the societal aspects too, and where will those articles live? These are big topics of course, so what we ought to do is to plan out a whole structure of articles. What ultimately do we want to have articles about, when it comes to GLBT topics?

I hope I've expressed my concerns, or at least my confusion, adequately... --Larry Sanger 01:45, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=gay seems to describe at least some of the etymology for "gay" very well.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 02:37, 28 July 2007 (CDT)