Talk:Free statistical software/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Gene Shackman (New page: {{subpages}} Just starting this article, feel free to jump in and help or give advice. ~~~~) |
imported>Gene Shackman (asking someone to link to my review) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just starting this article, feel free to jump in and help or give advice. [[User:Gene Shackman|Gene Shackman]] 04:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | Just starting this article, feel free to jump in and help or give advice. [[User:Gene Shackman|Gene Shackman]] 04:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
==add link to my review?== | |||
Would anyone be willing to add a couple of sentences to my review of free statistical software? http://gsociology.icaap.org/methods/soft.html This could be added into the main article section on reviews, perhaps saying something like what I wrote on my webpage "Basically, for correlation and simple regression, all gave the same results. Some also had the same results for forward stepwise." I only ask because I've searched the web and can't find any other review showing that the packages get the same results and so should be statistically equivalent. This seems like it would be useful information to have. Thanks [[User:Gene Shackman|Gene Shackman]] 03:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 13 March 2009
Just starting this article, feel free to jump in and help or give advice. Gene Shackman 04:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
add link to my review?
Would anyone be willing to add a couple of sentences to my review of free statistical software? http://gsociology.icaap.org/methods/soft.html This could be added into the main article section on reviews, perhaps saying something like what I wrote on my webpage "Basically, for correlation and simple regression, all gave the same results. Some also had the same results for forward stepwise." I only ask because I've searched the web and can't find any other review showing that the packages get the same results and so should be statistically equivalent. This seems like it would be useful information to have. Thanks Gene Shackman 03:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)