Talk:France, history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
imported>Robert W King
Line 30: Line 30:
:* [[History of the English language]]
:* [[History of the English language]]
:* [[History of vitamin C]]--[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 14:14, 6 February 2008 (CST)
:* [[History of vitamin C]]--[[User:Christian Liem|Christian Liem]] 14:14, 6 February 2008 (CST)
::Egads! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 14:16, 6 February 2008 (CST)
::Egads! It seems like [[History of (thing)]], and [[Place, history]]. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 14:16, 6 February 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 15:17, 6 February 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
To do.


Metadata here


Nice start! this will be a major article. Richard Jensen 17:08, 11 December 2007 (CST)

I'm thinking maybe a shortened rundown of the Third Republic is needed, and the longer version should become its own article. What do you think? Denis Cavanagh 09:46, 16 December 2007 (CST)

I agree. I think we should write everything here first, then spin off speratae articles, then shorten the treatment here. The first goal is to get a full history of France without worrying that it is too long. Richard Jensen 16:19, 16 December 2007 (CST)

Just added a little on the effects of WWI and the early 1920s. Chronologically working my way to 1940 :-) I bypassed the Treaty of Versailled because that in itself is a rather large section. I'll try and get back to it at some stage. Denis Cavanagh 08:21, 31 January 2008 (CST)

good work--keep plugging away! Richard Jensen 08:24, 31 January 2008 (CST)

Don't move

At least leave a message on the talk page before doing something as rash as that. Personally I don't mind if its called 'History of France' but Richard Jensen believes France, history (Corresponding with other general history articles) works better, and frankly, I'm willing to accept the opinion of a retired history professor over mine (A Second Year history student) Denis Cavanagh 08:58, 6 February 2008 (CST)

I agree that there should be a name convention for Citizendium articles. Some of the history articles here are named like Britain, history and France, history, but most are named like History of astronomy. We should take just one standard and stick with it. Has this ever been discussed elsewhere? I think we should take the example of History of astronomy because Astronomy, history could result in ambiguity. For example, should the article about the history of architecture in Europe be named Architecture, Europe, history or Europe, architecture, history? Why should we write the title like that, when we could have a normal sentence like History of European architecture? Just because someone is a professor doesn't mean he is infallible. Always take everything with a grain of salt. Here's some examples of the history articles on Citizendium:
Egads! It seems like History of (thing), and Place, history. --Robert W King 14:16, 6 February 2008 (CST)