Talk:Exponential function: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(New page: {{subpages}} I have a preference for the notation ln(z) for the inverse of exp(z). Is that not more common?--~~~~)
 
imported>Paul Wormer
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Notation==
I have a preference for the notation ln(z) for the inverse of exp(z). Is that not more common?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
:The notation log(z) is more common in advanced mathematics. I have seen a quote to the effect that you can distinguish those that know maths by whether they use log or ln for the natural logarithm :-) But ln(z) is more common in the secondary schools (at least in my experience) and probably also in physics, and it is not ambiguous. I think that we should use ln(z), perhaps with the exception of articles on advanced (say graduate-level) mathematics. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
:Concur. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 13:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


I have a preference for the notation ln(z) for the inverse of exp(z). Is that not more common?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
::So, I.M. Gelfand and G.E. Shilov (Generalized Functions, Vol I,  Academic 1964) don't know maths? And neither does Knuth, the Art ... vol 1, p. 23? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:18, 30 October 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Function of real or complex variable with the property that the function is equal to its first derivative. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Notation

I have a preference for the notation ln(z) for the inverse of exp(z). Is that not more common?--Paul Wormer 10:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The notation log(z) is more common in advanced mathematics. I have seen a quote to the effect that you can distinguish those that know maths by whether they use log or ln for the natural logarithm :-) But ln(z) is more common in the secondary schools (at least in my experience) and probably also in physics, and it is not ambiguous. I think that we should use ln(z), perhaps with the exception of articles on advanced (say graduate-level) mathematics. -- Jitse Niesen 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Concur. J. Noel Chiappa 13:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
So, I.M. Gelfand and G.E. Shilov (Generalized Functions, Vol I, Academic 1964) don't know maths? And neither does Knuth, the Art ... vol 1, p. 23? --Paul Wormer 09:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)