Talk:Ernest Rutherford: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Use of bold face?: new section)
imported>Caesar Schinas
 
Line 4: Line 4:


I seem to remember that bold face words are a no no (except the title words). I cannot find the rule in the article mechanics pages, so maybe I'm wrong, does anybody know? (This article has a quite a few).--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I seem to remember that bold face words are a no no (except the title words). I cannot find the rule in the article mechanics pages, so maybe I'm wrong, does anybody know? (This article has a quite a few).--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
:Nothing wrong with them that I'm aware of. If you do find a rule, I'd be interested to know what the reasoning is. [[User:Caesar Schinas|Caesar Schinas]] 10:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:24, 22 June 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (August 30, 1871 - October 19, 1937)The first person to split an atom. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Physics, Chemistry and History [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Use of bold face?

I seem to remember that bold face words are a no no (except the title words). I cannot find the rule in the article mechanics pages, so maybe I'm wrong, does anybody know? (This article has a quite a few).--Paul Wormer 10:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Nothing wrong with them that I'm aware of. If you do find a rule, I'd be interested to know what the reasoning is. Caesar Schinas 10:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)