Talk:English grammar: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(article checklist)
 
imported>Russell Potter
(Arcticle perspective)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:58, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:58, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
== Arcticle perspective ==
As I've mentioned on the entry for [[Pronoun]], we need to be careful here.  The "parts of speech" model, as widely as it is used in primary and secondary schools -- and useful though it may be for those, such as copyeditors and editors, for whom consistency of writen form is a legitimate and vital concern, is realy obsolete from the point of view of modern linguistics.  We also need to be sure that, from the very start, a prescriptivist model is not implicitly given as the only or primary model.  I would therefore propose that we use "word classes" instead of "parts of speech" as our model for subsidiary entries. 
I've made some revisions in this direction to the opening paragraphs.  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 10:51, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:51, 18 April 2007


Article Checklist for "English grammar"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 20:58, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Arcticle perspective

As I've mentioned on the entry for Pronoun, we need to be careful here. The "parts of speech" model, as widely as it is used in primary and secondary schools -- and useful though it may be for those, such as copyeditors and editors, for whom consistency of writen form is a legitimate and vital concern, is realy obsolete from the point of view of modern linguistics. We also need to be sure that, from the very start, a prescriptivist model is not implicitly given as the only or primary model. I would therefore propose that we use "word classes" instead of "parts of speech" as our model for subsidiary entries.

I've made some revisions in this direction to the opening paragraphs. Russell Potter 10:51, 18 April 2007 (CDT)