Talk:Diamond (gemstone): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
imported>Pat Palmer
m (Pat Palmer moved page Talk:Diamond to Talk:Diamond (gemstone))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
* http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8205/8205diamonds.html Yarnell, Amanda.  "The Many Facets of Man-Made Diamonds".  Chemical and Engineering News.  February 2, 2004.  Volume 82, No. 5.  CENEAR 82 05 pp. 26-31.  ISSN 0009-2347.   
* http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8205/8205diamonds.html Yarnell, Amanda.  "The Many Facets of Man-Made Diamonds".  Chemical and Engineering News.  February 2, 2004.  Volume 82, No. 5.  CENEAR 82 05 pp. 26-31.  ISSN 0009-2347.   
* http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/diamonds/ American Museum of Natural History.  "The Nature of Diamonds."  Exhibition, Nov 1, 1997 - August 30, 1998.
* http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/diamonds/ American Museum of Natural History.  "The Nature of Diamonds."  Exhibition, Nov 1, 1997 - August 30, 1998.
:I'm adding this to "external links" --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 05:14, 2 February 2008 (CST)
== Nice start ==
Thanks [[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] for having started this article which was among [[CZ:Core Articles/Natural Sciences|Core Articles]] in Earth Science. You'll get the points you didn't claim, as usual!
[[Ciao]], --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 05:12, 2 February 2008 (CST)
:Actually, Synthetic diamonds of higher quality then natural diamonds, which is part of the debate.  The fact that they're "too good" is the argument used by people at DeBeers, etc. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:50, 2 February 2008 (CST)
::Oops, you might well be right - perhaps my infos are outdated (and in fact you see I gave no references). Please go ahead and correct. --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 02:21, 3 February 2008 (CST)

Latest revision as of 09:42, 24 January 2021

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A stable allotrope of carbon where the carbon atoms are arranged in an isometric-hexoctahedral crystal lattice, commonly used in industrial applications and jewelry. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Earth Sciences, Physics and Engineering [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Development resources

I'm adding this to "external links" --Nereo Preto 05:14, 2 February 2008 (CST)

Nice start

Thanks Robert W King for having started this article which was among Core Articles in Earth Science. You'll get the points you didn't claim, as usual!

Ciao, --Nereo Preto 05:12, 2 February 2008 (CST)

Actually, Synthetic diamonds of higher quality then natural diamonds, which is part of the debate. The fact that they're "too good" is the argument used by people at DeBeers, etc. --Robert W King 09:50, 2 February 2008 (CST)
Oops, you might well be right - perhaps my infos are outdated (and in fact you see I gave no references). Please go ahead and correct. --Nereo Preto 02:21, 3 February 2008 (CST)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Diamond_(gemstone)&oldid=368025"