Talk:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Yamakuchi
imported>Michael J. Formica
Line 6: Line 6:


I didn't want to suggest we put that in the article or anything, but thought it would go a long way toward explaining my inclusion of the [[Szasz]] link. :-)--[[User:David Yamakuchi|David Yamakuchi]] 02:45, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
I didn't want to suggest we put that in the article or anything, but thought it would go a long way toward explaining my inclusion of the [[Szasz]] link. :-)--[[User:David Yamakuchi|David Yamakuchi]] 02:45, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
:Your inclusion, despite being referenced, is POV -- sorry, Larry -- and clearly informed by your positionality regarding the efficiacy of the DSM as a diagnostic tool. --[[User:Michael J. Formica|Michael J. Formica]] 13:46, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:46, 30 May 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A compendium, published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), that presents a categorization of mental disorders, as well as their associated diagnostic criteria. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Psychology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

DSM and Homosexuality

When my Psych professor (Joe Mustari, Wilbur Wright College, Chicago, IL) stated that the APA had originally listed homosexuality in the DSM as a "disorder", and finally (apparently begrudgingly) removed it in the 1974(?) edition, I decided that this manual's pages will likely make an excellent substitute for toilet paper.

I didn't want to suggest we put that in the article or anything, but thought it would go a long way toward explaining my inclusion of the Szasz link. :-)--David Yamakuchi 02:45, 19 May 2008 (CDT)

Your inclusion, despite being referenced, is POV -- sorry, Larry -- and clearly informed by your positionality regarding the efficiacy of the DSM as a diagnostic tool. --Michael J. Formica 13:46, 30 May 2008 (CDT)