Talk:Cyberterrorism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Andrew M. Colarik
mNo edit summary
 
imported>Eric M Gearhart
(Added checklist, added blurb on References)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Terrorism, Cyber
|                cat1 = Computers
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 15:33, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
Because cyber terrorism has so many variations to its definitions, it is best if the prominent ones are posted in chronological order in addition to what has been posted.
Because cyber terrorism has so many variations to its definitions, it is best if the prominent ones are posted in chronological order in addition to what has been posted.
==References, wikified==
Your references aren't wikified at all. This makes it hard to cite your sources elsewhere on the wiki, and makes your article less consistent with other articles. See the [[PHP]] article for a perfect example of a good reference section. I can help with "wikifying" your references, if you like --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 15:33, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 15:33, 6 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Cyberterrorism"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Eric M Gearhart 15:33, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Because cyber terrorism has so many variations to its definitions, it is best if the prominent ones are posted in chronological order in addition to what has been posted.

References, wikified

Your references aren't wikified at all. This makes it hard to cite your sources elsewhere on the wiki, and makes your article less consistent with other articles. See the PHP article for a perfect example of a good reference section. I can help with "wikifying" your references, if you like --Eric M Gearhart 15:33, 6 April 2007 (CDT)