Talk:Cryptography/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Date?: ... only copy edits) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Approval plans: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::: Just for the record: I have carefully restricted myself to copy edits, and avoided any contribution to content. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 21:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | :::: Just for the record: I have carefully restricted myself to copy edits, and avoided any contribution to content. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 21:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Approval plans == | |||
Peter, I don't think you fully understood: I will Approve this article ONLY when Howard's name is GONE from the list of approving Editors, not with it just being moved to a secondary place. I thought I had made that clear a long time ago, but apparently not. You archived all the earlier discussion about this, which I think was rather hasty.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:01, 26 May 2010
Updated
I have just updated the version to be approved. I also moved the -- very long -- talk page to the Archive for a fresh start. --Peter Schmitt 23:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Date?
Message above is "Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 24 May 2010." It is late on the 25th in my timezone. Should the message be changed? Can approval go ahead? Sandy Harris 13:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'll Approve it if Joe Quick says to go ahead. Why don't you message him at User:Approvals Manager. Hayford Peirce 17:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Don't think he's solved it yet, but he is having to get new connectivity at home -- until then, he's limited. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hayford, let me recall you this message: Thanks for taking care of this one in my absence. My internet connection has become really unreliable lately. --Joe (Approvals Manager) 14:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Boris Tsirelson 17:52, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Just for the record: I have carefully restricted myself to copy edits, and avoided any contribution to content. --Peter Schmitt 21:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Approval plans
Peter, I don't think you fully understood: I will Approve this article ONLY when Howard's name is GONE from the list of approving Editors, not with it just being moved to a secondary place. I thought I had made that clear a long time ago, but apparently not. You archived all the earlier discussion about this, which I think was rather hasty.... Hayford Peirce 17:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)