Talk:Coulomb's law: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Paul Wormer
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Correction received in mail ==
I received the following in mail:
:Hello,
:You are probably not the person in charge to fix details on particular articles, but I could not find the creator of the article about "coulumbs law" . Please, if you could send it forward to him....
:The article has a small error on the second formula, where it says "Er" should say "Eo", also on its inmedietly posterior explanation.
:Thank you and congratulations for a nice work.
:Cristian
--[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 15:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
::Added a sentence clarifying why the equation is correct.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 06:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:48, 1 September 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition An inverse-square distance law, like Newton's gravitational law, describing the forces acting between electric point charges; also valid for the force between magnetic poles. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Physics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Correction received in mail

I received the following in mail:

Hello,
You are probably not the person in charge to fix details on particular articles, but I could not find the creator of the article about "coulumbs law" . Please, if you could send it forward to him....
The article has a small error on the second formula, where it says "Er" should say "Eo", also on its inmedietly posterior explanation.
Thank you and congratulations for a nice work.
Cristian

--Larry Sanger 15:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Added a sentence clarifying why the equation is correct.--Paul Wormer 06:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)