Talk:Cognition

From Citizendium
Revision as of 11:08, 14 January 2008 by imported>Larry Sanger
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The central nervous system's processing of information relevant to interacting with itself and its internal and external environment. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Psychology, Philosophy and Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

"Cognition is formally defined as the ability to recognize and take social perspective." As a philosopher who has had many courses in psychology, this is a new one on me. Cognition is not "formally defined" in any way by cognitive scientists at all--no such general term is subject to formal definition--and it certainly is not defined as "the ability to recognize and take social perspective," except perhaps by followers of Ken Wilbur (I guess). The article shouldn't be written from the point of view of Ken Wilbur, but of all thinkers and scientists who study cognition: so, the first order of business is to explain the varying perspectives on the topic. Perhaps including Wilbur's, although (sorry) I don't think his is even close to being the most important.

I hope you'll move the article in the direction of more inclusiveness, Michael. --Larry Sanger 08:55, 14 January 2008 (CST)

This statement "Cognition is not "formally defined" in any way by cognitive scientists at all--no such general term is subject to formal definition--and it certainly is not defined as "the ability to recognize and take social perspective,"..." is incorrect. See [1] --Michael J. Formica 09:51, 14 January 2008 (CST)
My reply (on the above page--let's move the discussion here, where it's relevant) was to ask for a source. --Larry Sanger 10:08, 14 January 2008 (CST)