Talk:Carnot cycle

From Citizendium
Revision as of 12:13, 18 November 2009 by imported>Paul Wormer (→‎Efficiency: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Reversible thermodynamic cycle consisting of: isotherm–isentrope–isotherm–isentrope. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics and Chemistry [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  Chemical Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Efficiency

I am very unhappy about the literature on the efficiency of arbitrary cycles. As a warning for future readers I put here the following note.

I learned in Kindergarten that the Carnot cycle is the most efficient reversible cycle, but I see written in many places that all reversible cycles are equally efficient. Even the great Fermi says so. I gave it quite some thought and came up with the argument in the section "remark". This section does not come from any source (other than my brains), therefore, in a certain sense it could be called research. However, I did not want to follow Fermi, because I think he is careless and borders on being wrong, and I also didn't want to skip the point altogether. It is not out of the question that my former teachers and I are mistaken and therefore this warning. --Paul Wormer 17:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Carnot_cycle&oldid=706567"