Talk:Binomial theorem: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Jitse Niesen
(→‎popular culture: "I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute.")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]]
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]]
==popular culture==
Can we get rid of the '''In popular culture''' section? It adds nothing to anyone's understanding of the binomial theorem. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 11:02, 15 July 2008 (CDT)
:I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 16:22, 15 July 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 16:22, 15 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition  for any natural number n. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

status is really about 2.5 - 2 for the elementary binomial theorem/formula, and 3 for the Newtonian. Anthony Argyriou 17:23, 18 July 2007 (CDT)


While the definition is strictly true, it seems written backwards, in that if you actually do the sum for (x+y)^2 the answer you get as the equation is written is y^2 + 2xy + x^2. Of course you can rearrange to get x^2 + 2xy + y^2. Another way to write it would be

x^(n-k)y^(k), in which case you directly get the answers as shown in the examples.

David E. Volk

popular culture

Can we get rid of the In popular culture section? It adds nothing to anyone's understanding of the binomial theorem. Anthony Argyriou 11:02, 15 July 2008 (CDT)

I agree, so I'll delete it in a minute. -- Jitse Niesen 16:22, 15 July 2008 (CDT)