Talk:Associated Legendre function: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Problem: new section)
Line 23: Line 23:


I didn't like the reference to WP and tried my hand at the integral, which indeed is not difficult. Doing this I found another slip of the pen.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I didn't like the reference to WP and tried my hand at the integral, which indeed is not difficult. Doing this I found another slip of the pen.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
== Problem ==
Let us apply the following equation (taken from Dan's proof and which holds for ''l'' ≥ 1) for ''l'' = 1:
:<math>\int\limits_{-1}^{1}\left( x^{2} -1\right) ^{l}  dx =\frac{2\left(
l+1\right) }{2l+1} \int\limits_{-1}^{1}\left( x^{2} -1\right) ^{l-1}  dx
</math>
Then is it true that
:<math>
\int\limits_{-1}^{1}\left( x^{2} -1\right) dx =\frac{2\left(
1+1\right) }{2+1} \int\limits_{-1}^{1}  dx \quad?
</math>
Integration of both sides gives
:<math>
\frac{1}{3} \left[x^3\right]_{-1}^{1} \; -\;  \left[ x\right]_{-1}^{1}
\;\stackrel{?}{=}\; \frac{4}{3}\;  \left[ x \right]_{-1}^{1} \;\Rightarrow\;
\frac{2}{3} - 2 \;\stackrel{?}{=}\; \frac{8}{3}  \;\Rightarrow\; -4 \;\stackrel{?}{=}\; 8
</math>
The problem is not trivial because the recursion ends with this integral. Dan, HELP!
--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:16, 6 September 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Proofs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Function defined by where P denotes a Legendre function. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories mathematics and physics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Started from scratch, because (as so often) the Wikipedia article contains many duplications.--Paul Wormer 10:08, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Added link to proof of orthogonality and derivation of normalization constant

I added a link to a proof of the first integral equation in the Orthogonality relations section Dan Nessett 16:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Formattting of proof

I formatted the proof somewhat to my taste (which is mainly determined by a careful reading of Knuth's the TeXbook). Most of my changes are self-explanatory. I added the integration by parts formula, because it was not clear at all where the u and the v' came from. Further

--Paul Wormer 12:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Nice formating. Thanks for catching the problem. Also, I agree it is better to explicitly provide the integration by parts formula, rather than expecting the reader to already know it. Dan Nessett 00:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Move of equation

I moved the dif. eq. from the proof page to the main article. I did this because the proof does not use the dif. eq., but uses the definition of the assleg's (which is given in the statement of the theorem). --Paul Wormer 09:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Another (non-essential) error

I didn't like the reference to WP and tried my hand at the integral, which indeed is not difficult. Doing this I found another slip of the pen.--Paul Wormer 10:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Problem

Let us apply the following equation (taken from Dan's proof and which holds for l ≥ 1) for l = 1:

Then is it true that

Integration of both sides gives

The problem is not trivial because the recursion ends with this integral. Dan, HELP!

--Paul Wormer 11:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)