Talk:Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yi Zhe Wu
(checklist)
imported>Greg Woodhouse
(Subfields)
Line 15: Line 15:
Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate.  I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, autonomousness and complexity are worth pursuing in the meantime.
Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate.  I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, autonomousness and complexity are worth pursuing in the meantime.
--[[User:Stu Rodgers|Stu Rodgers]] 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
--[[User:Stu Rodgers|Stu Rodgers]] 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
== Subfields ==
I think we need to rethink the list of subfields. For one thing, I'm not sure that "exprt systems" really designates a subfield of AI, but is more of a marketing/businees term. In addition, it's not at all clear why both connectionism and ANN are on the list. I'll go ahead and edit/expand it a bit. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 15:40, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 15:40, 26 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Artificial intelligence"
Workgroup category or categories computers Workgroup, robotics Workgroup, philosophy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Yi Zhe Wu 21:11, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






I have specifically avoided a discussion on the notions of "strong" AI and "weak" AI. These categories have been used by some to denote the ultimate goals of the AI community. It is not clear to me that the "entire AI community" has any "shared or common goal" so I have avoided the subject. Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate. I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, autonomousness and complexity are worth pursuing in the meantime. --Stu Rodgers 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Subfields

I think we need to rethink the list of subfields. For one thing, I'm not sure that "exprt systems" really designates a subfield of AI, but is more of a marketing/businees term. In addition, it's not at all clear why both connectionism and ANN are on the list. I'll go ahead and edit/expand it a bit. Greg Woodhouse 15:40, 26 May 2007 (CDT)