Talk:Aluminium/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
imported>Graham Proud
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Would be worthwhile making reference to the flammability of Aluminium, and the implications for naval vessels in warfare - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Sheffield_(D80)
--[[User:Graham Proud|Graham Proud]] 08:34, 27 April 2011 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:34, 27 April 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Properties [?]
 

Why is this still (or again?) not under the official IUPAC name? This was discussed before somewhere. Peter Jackson 10:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Would be worthwhile making reference to the flammability of Aluminium, and the implications for naval vessels in warfare - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Sheffield_(D80) --Graham Proud 08:34, 27 April 2011 (CDT)