Difference between revisions of "Substance (philosophy)"

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thomas Ash
(Created article)
 
imported>Thomas Ash
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did.
In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. For example, it is commonly thought that a property like redness could not exist if there were not also some ''thing'' which was red, and hence properties are distinguished from substances, and substances are often thought of as the things which bear properties.
 
The notion of substance has been the subject of considerable debate in philosophy, and some consider it suspect. It is sometimes rejected altogether by modern, scientifically-inspired metaphysics, which substitutes the notions of fields or processes as fundamental.

Latest revision as of 06:55, 29 May 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In philosophy, a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. For example, it is commonly thought that a property like redness could not exist if there were not also some thing which was red, and hence properties are distinguished from substances, and substances are often thought of as the things which bear properties.

The notion of substance has been the subject of considerable debate in philosophy, and some consider it suspect. It is sometimes rejected altogether by modern, scientifically-inspired metaphysics, which substitutes the notions of fields or processes as fundamental.