Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • ...for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of [[randomized controlled trial|clinic Publication bias has been documented to occur.<ref name="pmid1727960">{{cite journal |author
    28 KB (3,923 words) - 14:09, 2 February 2023
  • 12 bytes (1 word) - 22:42, 23 December 2007
  • 211 bytes (27 words) - 10:19, 8 September 2009
  • 12 bytes (1 word) - 05:54, 17 October 2010
  • 387 bytes (48 words) - 17:35, 7 July 2009
  • ...f Failed Scientific Experiments] &mdash; an essay at [[Wired Magazine]] on publication bias and how it can be reduced
    221 bytes (34 words) - 05:21, 20 September 2010

Page text matches

  • ...about statistical significance, [[statistical power]], [[p value]], and [[publication bias]]
    174 bytes (20 words) - 09:53, 7 December 2022
  • ...f Failed Scientific Experiments] &mdash; an essay at [[Wired Magazine]] on publication bias and how it can be reduced
    221 bytes (34 words) - 05:21, 20 September 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    553 bytes (71 words) - 16:55, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    712 bytes (85 words) - 19:17, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    622 bytes (81 words) - 20:53, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    798 bytes (96 words) - 10:58, 11 January 2010
  • ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]]. ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]].
    2 KB (301 words) - 00:38, 13 January 2008
  • ...execution of randomized controlled trials. An example is an analysis of [[publication bias]].<ref name="pmid20679560">{{cite journal| author=Bourgeois FT, Murthy S, M
    1 KB (157 words) - 11:42, 26 June 2011
  • ===Publication bias=== {{main|Publication bias}}
    6 KB (909 words) - 11:29, 19 December 2011
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    2 KB (203 words) - 11:57, 11 January 2010
  • ...ned, then the predominance of positive homeopathy trial reports reflects [[publication bias]], and hence the magnitude of effects should diminish with sample size and ...ch are inconclusive or produce a negative outcome. This problem, called "[[publication bias]]", reflects both the perceived unwillingness of academic journals to publi
    7 KB (1,012 words) - 08:03, 1 April 2011
  • ...for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of [[randomized controlled trial|clinic Publication bias has been documented to occur.<ref name="pmid1727960">{{cite journal |author
    28 KB (3,923 words) - 14:09, 2 February 2023
  • ...eported funnel plot asymmetry which notes its results may be affected by [[publication bias]] against negative studies. Of note, in the field of complementary and [[alternative medicine]] (CAM), publication bias or bias in interpretation of studies, may be more common than in other disc
    10 KB (1,456 words) - 09:08, 4 October 2022
  • ...= |url= |issn=}}</ref>; however, the limited research may be affected by [[publication bias]].
    3 KB (412 words) - 08:18, 20 June 2011
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    4 KB (505 words) - 16:36, 11 January 2010
  • ===Publication bias=== ...http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8610949 |issn=}}</ref> Publication bias may be more of a problem in diagnostic test research than in randomized con
    36 KB (5,130 words) - 20:23, 15 August 2012
  • ===Publication bias=== In health care journals, [[publication bias]] threatens the interpretation of a body of literature leading to overly po
    32 KB (4,430 words) - 08:23, 27 September 2012
  • ...ignificant]], not only the [[p-value]] is important, but factors such as [[publication bias]] that might influence the [[p-value]] are important. To alter the a priori
    6 KB (899 words) - 10:21, 4 July 2023
  • ...f deficiencies in trial design, but mainly because of the possibility of [[publication bias]] - the phenomenon whereby trials that happen by chance to appear to show a ...n considering just those trials of “high quality” and after correcting for publication bias, the findings remained significant ''(means odds ratio of 1.86)'', however,
    28 KB (3,976 words) - 09:55, 31 October 2011
  • ====Small study effect and publication bias==== {{main|Publication bias}}
    73 KB (9,970 words) - 13:21, 2 February 2023
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)