Search results

Page title matches

• Federal Election Commission
  ...ious court cases affected it, especially the recent ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]] (2010). | publisher = Federal Election Commission
  1 KB (181 words) - 23:35, 16 October 2010
• Federal Election Commission/Definition
  172 bytes (23 words) - 08:57, 25 March 2016
• Federal Election Commission/Related Articles
  {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission}}
  525 bytes (68 words) - 00:03, 17 October 2010
• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  '''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''' is a controversial 2010 [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decisio ...n Reform Act of 2002]] (BCRA or McCain-Feingold), as administered by the [[Federal Election Commission]], which prohibits corporations and unions from using their [[general trea
  3 KB (429 words) - 18:47, 10 February 2011
• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission/Definition
  296 bytes (39 words) - 13:05, 10 October 2010
• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission/Related Articles
  827 bytes (133 words) - 13:05, 10 October 2010

Page text matches

• Corporate rights movement/Related Articles
  {{r|McConnell v. Federal Election Commission|''McConnell v. Federal Election Commission''}} {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission|''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''}}
  457 bytes (59 words) - 23:46, 11 October 2010
• Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002/Related Articles
  {{r|Federal Election Commission}} {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission|''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''}}
  423 bytes (54 words) - 17:43, 11 October 2010
• Federal Election Commission
  ...ious court cases affected it, especially the recent ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]] (2010). | publisher = Federal Election Commission
  1 KB (181 words) - 23:35, 16 October 2010
• Federal Election Commission/Related Articles
  {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission}}
  525 bytes (68 words) - 00:03, 17 October 2010
• Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
  ...prove the fairness of U.S. federal elections. It is administered by the [[Federal Election Commission]], and affects areas including:<ref>{{citation | publisher = [[Federal Election Commission]]
  2 KB (308 words) - 18:49, 10 February 2011
• Citizens United/Definition
  ...ational sovereignty and security"; appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case; the [[American Sovereignty Project]] is its lobbying arm
  480 bytes (62 words) - 17:07, 10 October 2010
• 501(c)(4)/Definition
  ...dinated with the candidate, may have been expanded by [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]
  441 bytes (68 words) - 00:06, 17 October 2010
• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  '''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''' is a controversial 2010 [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decisio ...n Reform Act of 2002]] (BCRA or McCain-Feingold), as administered by the [[Federal Election Commission]], which prohibits corporations and unions from using their [[general trea
  3 KB (429 words) - 18:47, 10 February 2011
• Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008/Related Articles
  {{r|Federal Election Commission}}
  1 KB (157 words) - 12:59, 4 November 2008
• Citizens United
  It was the successful appellant in appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case.
  764 bytes (102 words) - 17:10, 10 October 2010
• Elena Kagan
  .... Recently, she was the lead government attorney on ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]''.
  885 bytes (142 words) - 17:36, 29 January 2011
• Corporate rights movement
  ...f Commerce]]''<ref> 494 U.S. 652, 658-59</ref> (1990) and ''[[McConnell v. Federal Election Commission]]'' (2003) <ref>540 U. S. 93, 203–209</ref> (2003). The Austin decision i ...ns were extended to allow them political speech, by ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' (2010).
  5 KB (692 words) - 23:38, 29 September 2020
• 60 Plus Association
  ...their ad language as 'issue ads' and had to beware of running up against [[Federal Election Commission]] rules." Targets include [[Arizona]] incumbent representatives [[Ann Kirkp
  5 KB (663 words) - 15:16, 11 February 2011
• Samuel Alito
  He wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'', in which the Court upheld the right of corporations and to engage in f
  2 KB (268 words) - 10:45, 28 January 2010
• HonestReporting
  ...827910.ece}}</ref> The [[Council on American Islamic Relations]] filed a [[Federal Election Commission]] complaint about the film.
  3 KB (480 words) - 00:18, 28 January 2010
• Christine O'Donnell
  ...ation up later on her website. Her opponent mentioned [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]].<ref name=CNN2010-10-16>{{citation
  7 KB (1,071 words) - 17:45, 2 January 2011
• Tea Party Patriots
  ...June 2009, and the Tea Party Patriots Inc. [[PAC]], registered with the [[Federal Election Commission]] in January 2010.<blockquote>Of all the Tea Party factions, Tea Party Patr
  4 KB (618 words) - 19:03, 21 October 2010
• Emergency Committee for Israel
  ...suits against [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee|AIPAC]], and an [[Federal Election Commission|FEC]] ruling against [[Anti-Defamation League|ADL]] make clear, foreign age
  11 KB (1,632 words) - 20:21, 20 July 2010

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)