Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''Citizens United''' is an [[American conservative]] organization, organized as a [[501(c)(4) It was the successful appellant in appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case.786 bytes (106 words) - 09:00, 9 August 2023
- ...ong families, and national sovereignty and security"; appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case; the [[American Sovereignty Project480 bytes (62 words) - 17:07, 10 October 2010
- {{r|David Bossie}} Chairman of the Board and President, Citizens United and Citizens United Foundation {{r|Michael Boos}} Vice President, General Counsel and Director of Citizens United American Sovereignty Action Projec800 bytes (106 words) - 17:16, 10 October 2010
- '''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''' is a controversial 2010 [[Supreme Court ...rt decided a matter that began with the request for injunctive relief by [[Citizens United]], a [[501(c)(4)]] nonprofit corporation, against the [[Bipartisan Campaign3 KB (429 words) - 18:47, 10 February 2011
- 296 bytes (39 words) - 13:05, 10 October 2010
- 827 bytes (133 words) - 13:05, 10 October 2010
Page text matches
- '''Citizens United''' is an [[American conservative]] organization, organized as a [[501(c)(4) It was the successful appellant in appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case.786 bytes (106 words) - 09:00, 9 August 2023
- {{r|David Bossie}} Chairman of the Board and President, Citizens United and Citizens United Foundation {{r|Michael Boos}} Vice President, General Counsel and Director of Citizens United American Sovereignty Action Projec800 bytes (106 words) - 17:16, 10 October 2010
- {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission|''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''}}423 bytes (54 words) - 17:43, 11 October 2010
- ...ong families, and national sovereignty and security"; appellant in the ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' case; the [[American Sovereignty Project480 bytes (62 words) - 17:07, 10 October 2010
- {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission|''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''}}457 bytes (59 words) - 23:46, 11 October 2010
- '''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''' is a controversial 2010 [[Supreme Court ...rt decided a matter that began with the request for injunctive relief by [[Citizens United]], a [[501(c)(4)]] nonprofit corporation, against the [[Bipartisan Campaign3 KB (429 words) - 18:47, 10 February 2011
- ...had worked on them. Recently, she was the lead government attorney on ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]''.885 bytes (142 words) - 17:36, 29 January 2011
- {{r|Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission}}525 bytes (68 words) - 00:03, 17 October 2010
- He wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'', in which the Court upheld the right of2 KB (276 words) - 09:57, 26 March 2024
- ...ain-Feingold]]. Various court cases affected it, especially the recent ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]] (2010).1 KB (181 words) - 23:35, 16 October 2010
- ...recently been limited by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' (2010), the legislation forbade [[corpor2 KB (316 words) - 13:06, 9 August 2023
- ...ights of corporations were extended to allow them political speech, by ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' (2010).5 KB (692 words) - 23:38, 29 September 2020
- {{r|Dave Bossie}} President Citizens United; advisor, [[U.S. Committee for a Free Lebanon]]7 KB (1,062 words) - 06:57, 16 October 2009
- ...d to put the information up later on her website. Her opponent mentioned [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]].<ref name=CNN2010-10-16>{{citation7 KB (1,080 words) - 15:04, 15 April 2024