Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • 1) add sub1 = Biochemistry to the relevent Metadata page ...through the A-D listings in the Chemistry Workgroup and done this for the relevent articles.
    413 bytes (66 words) - 12:09, 6 April 2009
  • * {{search link|relevent||ns0|ns14|ns100}} (relevant)
    13 KB (1,675 words) - 21:27, 18 February 2010
  • ...your old photo album, scan in the best of your snaps and put them onto the relevent article. Pop down town and take a pic of the local landmark and put it own
    7 KB (1,099 words) - 05:02, 8 March 2024
  • ...site is some kind of consistency that is agreeable to all, or most, of the relevent authors. :) REALLY paraphrasing Lenon, "imagine ''whirled peas''". :) [[Us
    9 KB (1,566 words) - 05:33, 1 April 2024
  • ...your old photo album, scan in the best of your snaps and put them onto the relevent article. Pop down town and take a pic of the local landmark and put it own
    10 KB (1,574 words) - 05:02, 8 March 2024
  • ...Could help move these two proposals to the resolution stage or point me to relevent pages? Do I send an email note asking for co-sponsors first?
    10 KB (1,617 words) - 05:11, 17 September 2008
  • ...your old photo album, scan in the best of your snaps and put them onto the relevent article. Pop down town and take a pic of the local landmark and put it own
    13 KB (2,071 words) - 12:14, 13 March 2024
  • Once you guys figure this out, we need to add a relevent section in the [[How To]] guide.
    14 KB (2,224 words) - 18:31, 16 August 2013
  • ...rding Pauli, Stern-Gerlach and Zeeman did not imply that their work is not relevent to NMR spectroscopy - their work certainly is relevant, because the theory
    27 KB (4,528 words) - 08:22, 4 March 2023
  • ...should work though, which is usefull. And the menus should all link to the relevent pages, making navigation easier. [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 10:
    32 KB (5,248 words) - 15:43, 7 January 2010
  • ...el is used by political scientists in Britain, see citations. It is highly relevent to discuss how he left office. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 21:48
    36 KB (5,873 words) - 11:10, 18 August 2015
  • ...wards the page size. I have not looked at your code, so this might not be relevent to your templates. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk
    42 KB (6,780 words) - 17:33, 11 March 2024
  • ...for Sodium for example we could use [Ne]3s<sup>1</sup>. Showing just the relevent valence electrons. That being said, I don't care a whole lot if it stays o
    52 KB (8,876 words) - 08:34, 6 March 2024
  • ...s to the needle in a haystack problem; just not navigable. A smaller more relevent population is always more preferable, IMO. Knowing ALL connections is fine
    52 KB (8,701 words) - 18:02, 1 April 2024
  • ::Hi Robert, the relevent sections of Citizendium Policy for stubs is just in the [[CZ:Article Deleti
    82 KB (13,415 words) - 03:52, 8 March 2024
  • ...see the code), like [[ketoconazole]] or [[Hydrogen]], and then change the relevent parameters. David has been busy changing the element box, so I need to go b
    72 KB (11,903 words) - 05:43, 6 March 2024
  • ...bird at all instead of the zebra finch, they would have been just about as relevent (or rather, not). After all the whole point of the section is that it is ta
    101 KB (16,408 words) - 10:27, 17 September 2020
  • ...by respected scientists is notable.''" Previous publications are obviously relevent but should never be use as a crutch to support poor work. [[User:Chris Day|
    127 KB (20,547 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...bird at all instead of the zebra finch, they would have been just about as relevent (or rather, not). After all the whole point of the section is that it is ta
    178 KB (30,002 words) - 15:50, 15 January 2011
  • relevent->relevant
    88 KB (8,237 words) - 04:28, 22 November 2023
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)