Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...include>A bar that might be the source of the term "hole in the wall" when refering to bars118 bytes (21 words) - 16:37, 28 February 2022
- I think the lead is wrong. It states that, except for Nortn America, people refering to theatre are most often referring to the ''building''. When a British act1 KB (190 words) - 16:39, 2 February 2008
- * I deleted all the paragraphs, which are refering to supernatural. The text stated that science is not able to examine supern2 KB (314 words) - 18:12, 25 June 2008
- * {{search link|"refering"|refering|ns0|ns14|ns100}} (referring)13 KB (1,675 words) - 21:27, 18 February 2010
- ...ia:Ryū_(school)|Wikipedia article "Ryū_(school)"]], Ryū is a Japanese word refering to a school in any discipline.10 KB (1,514 words) - 12:45, 27 March 2024
- ::I was refering more to the line that reads "The neighboring countries bordering on Ukraine9 KB (1,473 words) - 13:56, 10 November 2010
- ...ristianity. Is this the intent, or would the reader be better served with refering to it as the Hebrew Bible in those headings? Hope that helps. --[[User:To10 KB (1,672 words) - 17:46, 9 July 2009
- ...cannot use brackets because if I do so in a species name this implies I am refering to a basyonym author and not the actual accepted name of the species. Well,40 KB (6,736 words) - 10:05, 20 March 2009
- Apparently you are refering to zipper-gate (Clinton) and tripper gate (Ford). [[User:David E. Volk|Dav32 KB (5,203 words) - 07:08, 26 March 2024
- ...rediction must not always point to the future. There might be a prediction refering to an event in the past, or a property of an object in the past, which is u35 KB (5,428 words) - 04:21, 22 November 2023
- :This following sentence does noit seem to make sense. It seems to be refering to the ligand as a receptor? Or am i missing something obivous?60 KB (9,725 words) - 15:01, 18 January 2009
- ...t journals (i.e. no more broadly). Or is this a different sentence you are refering to? For me the surprise was that the specialists read more broadly. Above60 KB (9,511 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- I think I see the problem. Are you refering to this line?56 KB (8,699 words) - 19:01, 15 July 2011
- ...effect in the approved article with respect to the other figures you were refering too. I forgot that those figure changes would also be detrimental to the la84 KB (14,066 words) - 03:11, 10 April 2007
- ...r fifth or sixth) meaning instead of its first. Maybe I am wrong about it refering to Dawkins, per se, and so maybe the idea of the "great men" is misplaced,85 KB (14,100 words) - 08:34, 6 March 2024
- refering->referring88 KB (8,237 words) - 04:28, 22 November 2023
- ::<b>Dana</b>, it was the LM potencies I was refering to.251 KB (40,897 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024