Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''No true Scotsman''' is a [[logical fallacy]] where someone attempts to avoid association wit992 bytes (158 words) - 16:13, 29 October 2008
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 16:43, 29 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[No true Scotsman]]30 bytes (4 words) - 09:05, 30 October 2008
- | pagename = No true Scotsman | abc = No true Scotsman2 KB (228 words) - 16:43, 29 October 2008
- 151 bytes (22 words) - 16:46, 29 October 2008
- 202 bytes (23 words) - 09:15, 22 October 2010
Page text matches
- '''No true Scotsman''' is a [[logical fallacy]] where someone attempts to avoid association wit992 bytes (158 words) - 16:13, 29 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[No true Scotsman]]30 bytes (4 words) - 09:05, 30 October 2008
- | pagename = No true Scotsman | abc = No true Scotsman2 KB (228 words) - 16:43, 29 October 2008
- {{r|No True Scotsman}}274 bytes (34 words) - 08:51, 22 October 2010
- {{r|No true Scotsman}}555 bytes (72 words) - 11:30, 11 January 2010
- == No True Scotsman fallacy == The part about 'Real Buddhism' strikes me as a big [[No True Scotsman]] fallacy, where anyone who is not fully tolerant is defined out of being B11 KB (1,872 words) - 07:53, 2 March 2024
- Removing this strikes me as being the homeopathic equivalent of the [[No True Scotsman]] fallacy. One just conveniently recategorises the homeopaths who are doing300 KB (47,866 words) - 15:19, 20 March 2023