Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- '''Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service''' is a ruling by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]].<ref name=Supr3 KB (396 words) - 08:50, 24 June 2023
- 327 bytes (49 words) - 18:12, 19 November 2009
- | pagename = Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service | abc = Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service2 KB (250 words) - 09:42, 28 April 2008
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 09:43, 28 April 2008
- 186 bytes (28 words) - 19:23, 19 March 2009
- 281 bytes (34 words) - 09:51, 28 April 2008
- 302 bytes (39 words) - 13:19, 2 February 2023
Page text matches
- '''Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service''' is a ruling by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]].<ref name=Supr3 KB (396 words) - 08:50, 24 June 2023
- I did copy references from the wikipedia article, but as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]], lists of facts are not protected by copyright. [[User:George Swan|Georg323 bytes (45 words) - 01:42, 31 January 2024
- {{r|Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service}}267 bytes (36 words) - 13:14, 2 February 2023
- ...c. I copied over its references - which are not copyright worthy as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]].428 bytes (64 words) - 00:58, 5 January 2024
- ...s all "facts", does not meet the criteria for copyright protection under [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]]. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 14:16425 bytes (65 words) - 14:16, 27 August 2022
- | pagename = Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service | abc = Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service2 KB (250 words) - 09:42, 28 April 2008
- ...nd paste the references from the most current wikipedia version. As per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]], lists of facts are not eligible for copyright, and I believe references472 bytes (70 words) - 17:38, 2 January 2024
- I copied and adapted the wikipedia article's {{tl|infobox}}, but as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]], lists of facts are not protected by copyright. Anyhow, I made significa541 bytes (79 words) - 00:37, 31 January 2024
- ...w article about Lohr, in 2022, and I plan to use its references. As per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] lists of facts are not protected by copyright, and references are just li534 bytes (86 words) - 13:38, 19 February 2024
- [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] says lists of facts are not eligible for copyright protection. Reference651 bytes (91 words) - 08:08, 13 February 2024
- ...the fields. I did so under my understanding of the [[SCOTUS]] ruling in [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]]. It says lists of facts are not eligible for copyright protection. Only638 bytes (100 words) - 02:50, 4 January 2024
- {{r|Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service}}1 KB (217 words) - 13:14, 2 February 2023
- {{r|Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service}}909 bytes (144 words) - 05:47, 8 April 2010
- * [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat]], WRT attribution to the wikipedia, as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service|Feist v Rural]], the SCOTUS ruled that ordinary ''"lists of facts"'' are no1 KB (224 words) - 17:25, 16 April 2024
- {{r|Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service}}1 KB (202 words) - 03:37, 8 March 2024
- ...is does not require adding attribution to the wikipedia, because, as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]], list of facts are not protected by copyright, and, I claim a reference i2 KB (291 words) - 17:15, 7 January 2024
- # [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service ]]9 KB (789 words) - 12:05, 6 March 2024
- # [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service ]]13 KB (1,298 words) - 01:09, 21 March 2024
- :I think [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] is worth reviewing in this discussion.22 KB (3,701 words) - 09:53, 28 April 2008
- | [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] ||40 KB (3,578 words) - 18:16, 13 March 2024