Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- The '''Detainee Treatment Act of 2005''' (42USC2000dd) is an act passed by the [[United States Congress]] | title = Detainee Treatment Act of 20054 KB (582 words) - 14:04, 1 April 2024
- :However, the appeals court's ruling was under the section of the Detainee Treatment Act that allowed captives to challenge their Combatant Status Review Tribunal's5 KB (724 words) - 13:12, 8 March 2024
- | pagename = Detainee Treatment Act | abc = Detainee Treatment Act2 KB (216 words) - 10:09, 10 April 2008
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 10:50, 10 April 2008
- 140 bytes (19 words) - 13:14, 7 March 2009
- Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Detainee Treatment Act]]. Needs checking by a human.658 bytes (87 words) - 16:41, 1 April 2024
Page text matches
- The only appeal under the [[Detainee Treatment Act]] to run to completion, prior to the Supreme Court restoring access to [[Ha213 bytes (31 words) - 17:58, 28 March 2022
- {{r|Detainee Treatment Act}}316 bytes (45 words) - 16:54, 24 February 2024
- {{r|Detainee Treatment Act}}362 bytes (51 words) - 11:55, 21 March 2024
- {{r|Detainee Treatment Act}}877 bytes (117 words) - 10:33, 23 March 2024
- | pagename = Detainee Treatment Act | abc = Detainee Treatment Act2 KB (216 words) - 10:09, 10 April 2008
- Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Detainee Treatment Act]]. Needs checking by a human.658 bytes (87 words) - 16:41, 1 April 2024
- The '''Detainee Treatment Act of 2005''' (42USC2000dd) is an act passed by the [[United States Congress]] | title = Detainee Treatment Act of 20054 KB (582 words) - 14:04, 1 April 2024
- {{r|Detainee Treatment Act}}745 bytes (103 words) - 10:04, 2 April 2024
- ...ary commission. The Court denied the U.S. government interpretation of the Detainee Treatment Act, "DTA §1005(e)(1) provides that “no court … shall have jurisdiction to ...ority, under either the Authorization for the Use of Military Force or the Detainee Treatment Act, for this specific military commission. They interpreted Quirin as assertin6 KB (908 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
- *Violate the Military Commissions Act of 2006 or the Detainee Treatment Act7 KB (1,103 words) - 07:29, 18 March 2024
- :However, the appeals court's ruling was under the section of the Detainee Treatment Act that allowed captives to challenge their Combatant Status Review Tribunal's5 KB (724 words) - 13:12, 8 March 2024
- To some extent, the Detainee Treatment Act] and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 were a Congressional objection to4 KB (571 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
- ...eneva Convention]]. Subsequent concerns about their treatment led to the [[Detainee Treatment Act]] (2005) and two rulings by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. S4 KB (574 words) - 12:13, 13 March 2024
- ::Through the [[Detainee Treatment Act of 2005]] and the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]] the [[United States11 KB (1,787 words) - 06:52, 17 March 2024
- ...e review, two laws were passed refining detention authority, beginning the Detainee Treatment Act in 2004. This set conditions of detention.11 KB (1,643 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
- # [[Detainee Treatment Act ]]9 KB (789 words) - 12:05, 6 March 2024
- ...nder this name when he first proposed what eventually became known as the "Detainee Treatment Act". ...rpose of this article? The phrase is relevant within the context of the [[Detainee Treatment Act]], but otherwise, the topic is covered under [[human-source intelligence]]50 KB (7,962 words) - 14:53, 6 April 2024
- # [[Detainee Treatment Act ]]13 KB (1,298 words) - 01:09, 21 March 2024
- ...ion positions, resulting, in part, in legislative correction through the [[Detainee Treatment Act]] and the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]].34 KB (5,029 words) - 10:44, 23 March 2024
- ...e Protection Act]], and the rights of detainees in Guantanamo Bay in the [[Detainee Treatment Act]]. These limitations were overruled by the Supreme Court in [[Hamdan v. Rum70 KB (10,151 words) - 15:04, 15 April 2024