Search results

...lipp, ed.) The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. XIV: The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court.

...list. The last item on the list is related to the criterion proposed by [[Karl Popper|Popper]]:<ref name=Popper/>

...hat constitutes an "event" and how one is said to "determine" another. A [[Karl Popper|Popper]]-like view emerges with an "event" as some kind of formalized "stat ::: —Karl Popper: ''The logic of scientific discovery'', p. 18 and p. 280</font>

...d to their cooperative behavior. Well-known proponents of such views are [[Karl Popper]] and [[John Eccles]].<ref name=Popper/>

...were most accepted when they were most incorrect, whilst in the Twentieth, Karl Popper accused Aristotle of having held up the development of thought itself. <ref

...ref name=computer/>) Another version is the "three world" formulation of [[Karl Popper|Popper]].<ref name=Popper/> These are examples of what is called ''epistem ...ects of success of extending science into certain areas of experience. A [[Karl Popper|Popper]]-like view emerges with an "event" as some kind of formalized "stat

| date = 1923}}</ref>. [[Karl Popper]] believed that mathematics was not experimentally [[Falsifiability|falsifi

The philosopher of science [[Karl Popper]] attacked Freud's psychoanalytical theories vehemently, but he did so beca

*The philosopher of science [[Karl Popper]] argued that a theory that has no testable components "has no connection w

...s a definition of objectivity, almost all social science fails :-) This is Karl Popper's negative and positive proof as scientific method, which I fully support (