Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...ng anycast with routers, it is best to use a routing protocol, such as the Border Gateway Protocol or Open Shortest Path First, that has an explicit router identifier that ca
    3 KB (432 words) - 07:36, 18 March 2024
  • *Border Gateway Protocol<ref name=RFC4098>{{citation
    2 KB (310 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • *BGP-4 ["A Border Gateway Protocol 4" (BGP-4) RFC 4271]
    5 KB (796 words) - 14:09, 8 December 2022
  • | Border Gateway Protocol
    16 KB (2,394 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
  • ...r|routes]]). These routes are managed via the dynamic [[routing protocol]] Border Gateway Protocol]] ...nsure unique addresses, and exchange information on reachability using the Border Gateway Protocol
    17 KB (2,484 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024
  • ...tes. Several routing protocols such as Open Shortest Path First | OSPF and Border Gateway Protocol | BGP maintain internal data bases of candidate routes that they will promo
    9 KB (1,432 words) - 15:01, 20 March 2024
  • Using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) provider will advertise, to its peers in the DFZ, the minimum number
    4 KB (602 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...as [[Autonomous System]]s (AS) exchanging routing information through the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). ...>"Peering", unfortunately, is also used as a term for the two parties in a Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) session. While AS do interconnect using BGP, this discussion is at a
    9 KB (1,461 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...authority of the [[Internet Assigned Numbers Authority]] (IANA), using the Border Gateway Protocol. A number of large SPs are treating their customers' public Internet conne ...formation can be sent through extensions to a routing protocol such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)<ref name=rfc4364 /> or [[Open Shortest Path First]] (OSPF) <ref name=
    15 KB (2,421 words) - 05:49, 8 April 2024
  • ...orting) of routes. In practice, these functions will be carried out by the Border Gateway Protocol, although RPSL does not directly generate BGP protocol messages.
    6 KB (945 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...nderstood; this is comparable to the '''transitive''' attribute bit in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The next two bits, S1 and S2, define scope of flooding:
    18 KB (3,085 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...outer link, when it is known that the first protocol that comes up will be Border Gateway Protocol, and the other router is transferring a full routing table. Until the routi
    13 KB (1,980 words) - 16:23, 30 March 2024
  • using such techniques as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) [RFC number
    24 KB (3,628 words) - 21:04, 17 April 2014
  • ...[[Internet]], so one of the major changes in the current version 4 of the Border Gateway Protocol was CIDR support; all addressing information transported by BGP is coupled
    26 KB (4,062 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...d Interior Gateway Routing Protocol]]. More complex issues are involved in Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) IPv6, and multicast routing protocols are outside the immediate scope
    39 KB (5,823 words) - 12:18, 30 March 2024
  • ...tive criteria. For example, in the fundamental Internet routing mechanism (Border Gateway Protocol), it had been assumed that a message that a network was no longer reachable
    56 KB (8,977 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
View ( | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)