Search results

[[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein's]] ''[[Philosophical Investigations]]'' (§1) quotes the ''Co

*A new word is like a fresh seed sown on the ground of the discussion. –[[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] *Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. –[[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]

* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein, Ludwig]]. ''On Certainty''

...rificationist]]s), who used it to build upon the theory of language that [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] had introduced in his ''[[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]]''. In essence,

...life choice, I hear echoes of Walter Kaufmann, an opinionated teacher, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, the focus of my thesis, as both were disillusioned with academic brands of

...rk: Ecco 2001. A review of the origin of the conflict between Popper and [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], focused on events leading up to their volatile first encounter at 1946 C

One approach to this question is the work of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein]], who pointed out the futility of looking for ''the'' meaning ...hough you still owe me a definition of exactness.”<ref name=Wittgenstein/>|Ludwig Wittgenstein| Philosophical Investigations, excerpted from §68 & §69}}

...osophy — can meaningfully address the concept of omnipotence itself.<ref>[[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein, Ludwig.]] [[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]] (6.41 and follow The philosopher [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] is often interpreted as arguing that language is not up to the task of de

*{{pl|Ludwig Wittgenstein}}

...ns which is also developed in [[Saul Kripke|Kripke's]] interpretation of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein]] on rules... and which many have read into [[Hilary Putnam|Pu

<!--::Where do Wittgenstein and Quine argue this? [[Philosopher]]s such as [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], [[W. V. Quine]], and [[Jacques Derrida]] have disputed the possibility o

...ugh [[logical analysis]] of language, following [[Bertrand Russell]] and [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], while Continental philosophy draws from a variety of philosophical posit

[[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] went as far as arguing that language was itself a game consisting of toke [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] was probably the first to give serious thought to the definition of the w

...in science and skeptical of [[theology]] and [[metaphysics]]. Following [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], many held the [[correspondence theory of truth]], although some, like Ne *[[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]

{{cite book |title=Philosophical Investigations|author=Ludwig Wittgenstein |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=t_dPcAAACAAJ |isbn=0631231595 |year=2

* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein, L.]] (1997): „[[Philosophische Untersuchungen]]“, in: [[T

{{rpl|Ludwig Wittgenstein}}

Following [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein's]] ''[[Philosophical Investigations]]'' and in reaction to th

...ophische Abhandlung'' ([[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]]), published by [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] in 1918.

...]], [[John Stuart Mill]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], and [[Martin Heidegger]]—to omit many more recent names. Any such lis ...language, and the relationship between language and thought. The work of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] and [[Martin Heidegger]] heralded this approach, with the former showing