Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • {{r|Border gateway protocol}}
    526 bytes (63 words) - 10:56, 7 May 2008
  • {{r|Multiprotocol Border Gateway Protocol}}
    633 bytes (72 words) - 06:31, 17 March 2024
  • {{r|Border gateway protocol}}
    416 bytes (49 words) - 10:55, 7 May 2008
  • ...utonomous system]]s, based on reachability information transmitted via the Border Gateway Protocol
    174 bytes (22 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...rmation from local configuration and [[routing protocol]]s, especially the Border Gateway Protocol
    283 bytes (38 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • A means of increasing the scalability of the Border Gateway Protocol, with less overhead but also less policy control than BGP confederations
    177 bytes (25 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...ages}}</noinclude>A paradigm used in [[routing protocols]], especially the Border Gateway Protocol, the basis for routing in the [[Internet]]
    158 bytes (21 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...d the [[Interior Gateway Routing Protocol]], and the path vector protocol, Border Gateway Protocol.
    1 KB (162 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • One or more 16- or 32-bit fields that accompany an address advertised by the Border Gateway Protocol, describing some administrative aspect of the address, such as membership i
    297 bytes (45 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...to multiple ISPs may be in the DFZ. Any production DFZ router will run the Border Gateway Protocol as its major means of acquiring routing information.
    535 bytes (82 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • Exterior routing protocols, such as the Border Gateway Protocol as the only unicast exterior routing protocol in the Internet, are more "re ...unicast exterior routing protocol is in general use, the IETF-standardized Border Gateway Protocol.
    4 KB (647 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...of the domain. For communications to external [[Autonomous System]]s, the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) can accept and advertise [[external route]]s.
    1 KB (234 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • The Border Gateway Protocol, version 4 (BGP-4) must establish a [[TCP connection]] and a [[BGP session] | title = A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
    3 KB (426 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...p-free paths toward a given destination. Its use is most prominent in the Border Gateway Protocol, the basis for routing in the [[Internet]]. A subset has been used for sour
    1 KB (203 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • A '''route reflector''' is a technique for interconnecting Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routers, inside an [[autonomous system]], to improve scalability. One | title = Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Persistent Route Oscillation Condition
    3 KB (532 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...Task Force]] (IETF) designs complex internetworking mechanisms such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), and [[Multiprotocol Label Switching]] (MPLS), it is at NANOG, and ot
    3 KB (368 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...mallest ISPs, they will interconnect to upstreams and to [[peer]]s use the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). ISPs that run BGP will normally have their own [[Autonomous System]]
    3 KB (456 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...th separate from the main production network is often used from an ingress Border Gateway Protocol customer or interprovider router, to the nearest sinkhole.
    3 KB (490 words) - 05:49, 8 April 2024
  • These routers do not run the Border Gateway Protocol and generally do not provide an [[SNMP]] interface. These are important for Routers that run the Border Gateway Protocol usually are either part of the Internet service provider infrastructure, or
    6 KB (985 words) - 12:34, 30 March 2024
  • ...Task Force]] (IETF) designs complex internetworking mechanisms such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), and [[Multiprotocol Label Switching]] (MPLS), it is at NANOG, and ot
    2 KB (259 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...ng anycast with routers, it is best to use a routing protocol, such as the Border Gateway Protocol or Open Shortest Path First, that has an explicit router identifier that ca
    3 KB (432 words) - 07:36, 18 March 2024
  • *Border Gateway Protocol<ref name=RFC4098>{{citation
    2 KB (310 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • *BGP-4 ["A Border Gateway Protocol 4" (BGP-4) RFC 4271]
    5 KB (796 words) - 14:09, 8 December 2022
  • | Border Gateway Protocol
    16 KB (2,394 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
  • ...r|routes]]). These routes are managed via the dynamic [[routing protocol]] Border Gateway Protocol]] ...nsure unique addresses, and exchange information on reachability using the Border Gateway Protocol
    17 KB (2,484 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024
  • ...tes. Several routing protocols such as Open Shortest Path First | OSPF and Border Gateway Protocol | BGP maintain internal data bases of candidate routes that they will promo
    9 KB (1,432 words) - 15:01, 20 March 2024
  • Using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) provider will advertise, to its peers in the DFZ, the minimum number
    4 KB (602 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...as [[Autonomous System]]s (AS) exchanging routing information through the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). ...>"Peering", unfortunately, is also used as a term for the two parties in a Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) session. While AS do interconnect using BGP, this discussion is at a
    9 KB (1,461 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...authority of the [[Internet Assigned Numbers Authority]] (IANA), using the Border Gateway Protocol. A number of large SPs are treating their customers' public Internet conne ...formation can be sent through extensions to a routing protocol such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)<ref name=rfc4364 /> or [[Open Shortest Path First]] (OSPF) <ref name=
    15 KB (2,421 words) - 05:49, 8 April 2024
  • ...orting) of routes. In practice, these functions will be carried out by the Border Gateway Protocol, although RPSL does not directly generate BGP protocol messages.
    6 KB (945 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...nderstood; this is comparable to the '''transitive''' attribute bit in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The next two bits, S1 and S2, define scope of flooding:
    18 KB (3,085 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...outer link, when it is known that the first protocol that comes up will be Border Gateway Protocol, and the other router is transferring a full routing table. Until the routi
    13 KB (1,980 words) - 16:23, 30 March 2024
  • using such techniques as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) [RFC number
    24 KB (3,628 words) - 21:04, 17 April 2014
  • ...[[Internet]], so one of the major changes in the current version 4 of the Border Gateway Protocol was CIDR support; all addressing information transported by BGP is coupled
    26 KB (4,062 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
  • ...d Interior Gateway Routing Protocol]]. More complex issues are involved in Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) IPv6, and multicast routing protocols are outside the immediate scope
    39 KB (5,823 words) - 12:18, 30 March 2024
  • ...tive criteria. For example, in the fundamental Internet routing mechanism (Border Gateway Protocol), it had been assumed that a message that a network was no longer reachable
    56 KB (8,977 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024