Rasul v. Bush/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} ==Parent topics== {{r|Extrajudicial detention, U.S.}} {{r|Guantanamo Bay detention camp}} ==Subtopics== <!-- List topics here that are included by this topic. --> ==Other...) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{r|Guantanamo Bay detention camp||**}}" to "") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Parent topics== | ==Parent topics== | ||
{{r|Extrajudicial detention, U.S.}} | {{r|Extrajudicial detention, U.S.}} | ||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Other related topics== | ==Other related topics== | ||
{{r|Ex parte Quirin}} | |||
{{r|In re Yamashita}} | {{r|In re Yamashita}} | ||
{{r|Johnson v. Eisentrager}} | {{r|Johnson v. Eisentrager}} | ||
{{r|Hamdan v. Rumsfeld}} | |||
{{r|Hamdi v. Rumsfeld}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:59, 21 March 2024
- See also changes related to Rasul v. Bush, or pages that link to Rasul v. Bush or to this page or whose text contains "Rasul v. Bush".
Parent topics
- Extrajudicial detention, U.S. [r]: Situations where the Executive Branch of the United States government has detained individuals without the authority of the judicial branch of government; there have been many cases going back to through the early history of the nation, sometimes during overt war, and, perhaps better known at present, directed against non-national threats. [e]
Subtopics
- Ex parte Quirin [r]: A 1942 Supreme Court of the United States ruling that affirmed the right to try captured enemy personnel, who operated in civilian clothing, by a Presidentially appointed secret military tribunal [e]
- In re Yamashita [r]: An unsuccessful appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, by Japanese General Tomiyuki Yamashita, challenging the legitimacy of the military commission that tried him [e]
- Johnson v. Eisentrager [r]: A 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that nonresident enemy aliens, captured in the context of a declared war outside the jurisdiction of any U.S. civil court, were purely under the jurisdiction of military law and had no access to the U.S. judicial system [e]
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2006 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, stating that there was no basis for trying, by U.S. military commission, a person captured in combat with U.S. allies on foreign soil, and turned over to U.S. forces [e]
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms against the United States, still was entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if he was an enemy combatant subject to military, rather than civilian, law [e]