Piracy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 29: Line 29:
===Air piracy===
===Air piracy===
==Current piracy and counter-piracy==
==Current piracy and counter-piracy==
===Straits of Malacca===
===Gulf of Aden===
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 13:37, 12 April 2009

Template:TOC-right

Piracy has been a scourge of the seas for millenia, but its definition has become more complex with the evolution of international law. The current primary reference comes from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 101:[1] " Piracy consists of [inciting, performing, or facilitating]:

  • any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
    • on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
    • against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;
  • any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;

Imperial Rome defined pirates simply, in the words of Marcus Tullius Cicero, as hostis humani generis, "enemies of the human race." That designation was an early example of universal jurisdiction; it was accepted that pirates were criminals that had put themselves beyond the law of nations, the only existing source of law. At the time, there was no distinction between territorial and international waters, and no source of international law. The idea of hostis humani generis grew to include other categories, such as slavery and genocide, but jurisdictional issues became more complex. There is considerable legal thought about bringing other offenses, such as transnational terrorism, under this doctrine, but that further complicates jurisdiction.[2]

Today, piracy at sea is a very real problem, but counter-piracy enforcement is complex.

Reprisal and Marque

While the usual phrasing of the framework for privateering is "letter of marque and reprisal", the idea of reprisal, or authorizing national merchant vessels to be armed against pirates, preceded the idea of marque, or using nationally authorized private warships used as part of foreign policy.[2]

After the Roman Empire fell, pirates remained a real problem. The Viking raiders both operated as sea pirates, but also raided land.

Privateering eliminated

In an annex to the Declaration of Paris (1856), which ended the Crimean War, a number of nations agreed to stop issuing letters of marque and reprisal. By that time, standing national navies existed and were more controllable tools of national policy.

Modern jurisdictional issues

Territorial waters

International waters

Air piracy

Current piracy and counter-piracy

Straits of Malacca

Gulf of Aden

References

  1. , Part VII, High Seas, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
  2. 2.0 2.1 Burgess DR Jr (July-August 2005), "The Dread Pirate Bin Laden: How thinking of terrorists as pirates can help win the war on terror", Legal Affairs