Pi (mathematical constant)/Proofs/An elementary proof that 22 over 7 exceeds π: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
: <math> 0 < \int_0^1 \frac{x^4(1 - x)^4}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = \frac{22}{7} - \pi</math>
: <math> 0 < \int_0^1 \frac{x^4(1 - x)^4}{x^2 + 1}\,dx = \frac{22}{7} - \pi</math>


Evaluation of this [[integral]] requires only routine first-year calculus techniques, see [[An elementary proof that 22 over 7 exceeds_%CF%80/Student Level|Student level subpage]].
Evaluation of this [[integral]] requires only routine first-year calculus techniques, see [[Pi_(mathematical_constant)/Proofs/Student_level_proof_that_22_over_7_exceeds_π|Student level subpage]].


What qualifies this as a proof is the fact that it demonstrates the result, but that is not its ''purpose'' in the present case, since the result can be derived by other means, including any method of computing &pi; accurately.  The formula naturally leads the reader to suspect that it is part of a larger pattern (see Lucas 2005 and Beukers 2000).
What qualifies this as a proof is the fact that it demonstrates the result, but that is not its ''purpose'' in the present case, since the result can be derived by other means, including any method of computing &pi; accurately.  The formula naturally leads the reader to suspect that it is part of a larger pattern (see Lucas 2005 and Beukers 2000).

Latest revision as of 15:08, 8 December 2009


The rational number 22/7 is the most widely cited rational approximation to π. It is an early convergent in the continued fraction expansion of π. The following startling and elegant formula shows that it in fact exceeds π:

Evaluation of this integral requires only routine first-year calculus techniques, see Student level subpage.

What qualifies this as a proof is the fact that it demonstrates the result, but that is not its purpose in the present case, since the result can be derived by other means, including any method of computing π accurately. The formula naturally leads the reader to suspect that it is part of a larger pattern (see Lucas 2005 and Beukers 2000).

The problem of showing that this integral evaluates to 22/7 − π, perhaps despite its elementary nature, appeared in the 1969 Putnam Competition.

References

  • Lucas, Stephen. "Integral proofs that 355/113 > π", Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, volume 32, number 4, pages 263–266, 2005.
  • Beukers, Frits. "A rational approach to π". Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde 2000, issue 4. (Online copy.)
  • Dalzell, D. P. (1944). "On 22/7", Journal of the London Mathematical Society 19, pages 133–134.
  • Dalzell, D. P. (1971). "On 22/7 and 355/113", Eureka; the Archimedeans' Journal, volume 34, pages 10–13.