Natural language

From Citizendium
Revision as of 00:01, 14 May 2007 by imported>Pat Palmer (first draft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Linguistics
Phonology
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Theoretical linguistics
Generative linguistics
Cognitive linguistics
Language acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Applied linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Creolistics
Evolutionary linguistics
Linguistic variation
Linguistic typology
Anthropological linguistics
Computational linguistics
Descriptive linguistics
Historical linguistics
Comparative linguistics
History of linguistics
Languagenaturalconstructed
Grammar

The phrase natural language means human speech and writing. The science of studying natural languages is known as linguistics, but linguistics is not the only scholarly area with an interest in this field. The discovery of the oldest evidence of human language, primarily via vestiges of early writing, falls under the pervue of archaeology and also history. The mechanisms related to learning of human languages may be of interest in psychology and medicine due to its exercise of higher brain function. Computer scientists have been engaged in the study of human languages for the purpose of machine translation between different human languages.

Properties of natural languages

Linguistic scholars have described human languages as a system of symbols (sometimes known as lexemes) and the grammar (rules) by which the symbols are manipulated. The assignment of meaning to a symbol in a human language is arbitrary. Any symbol can be mapped onto any concept (or even onto one of the rules of the grammar). For instance, there is nothing about the Spanish word nada itself that forces Spanish speakers to use it to mean "nothing". That is the meaning all Spanish speakers have memorized for that sound pattern. But for Croatian speakers nada means "hope". Not all mappings of symbols to concepts are entirely arbitrary, however; spoken language may assign meaning to symbols because the spoken sound is imitative of a natural phenomenon. Thus for example, the word "meow" sounds similar to what it represents (see Onomatopoeia)[1].

Origins of human language

No one yet agrees on when language was first used by humans (or their ancestors). Estimates range from about two million (2,000,000) years ago, during the time of Homo habilis, to as recently as forty thousand (40,000) years ago, during the time of Cro-Magnon man.

Language versus dialect classification

From the point of view of historical comparative linguistics, two natural languages with noticable difference in pronunciation but which are still mutually intelligible may be classified as being two dialects of the same language. However, the decision to term a particular regional language as its own language, versus a dialect of another language, is sometimes also the result of political divisions, cultural differences, distinctive writing systems, or other factors. Max Weinreich is credited as saying that "a language is a dialect with an army and a navy". For instance, some dialects of German are mutually intelligible with some dialects of Dutch. The transition between languages within the same language family is usually gradual (see dialect continuum). The concepts of Ausbausprache, Abstandsprache and Dachsprache are used to make finer distinctions about the degrees of difference between languages or dialects.

Study of grammar

The oldest surviving written grammar for any language is believed to be the Tolkāppiyam

(தொல்காப்பியம்), a book on the grammar of the Tamil language, written around

200 BC by Tolkāppiyar. Its classification of the alphabet into consonants and vowel

was a breakthrough. The historical record of the study of language begins in North India

with Pāṇini, the 5th century BC grammarian who formulated 3,959 rules of [[Sanskrit

language|Sanskrit]] morphology, known as the

Aṣṭādhyāyī (अष्टाध्यायी). Pāṇini’s grammar is

highly systematized and technical. Inherent in its analytic approach are the concepts of the

phoneme, the morpheme, and the root; the phoneme was only

recognized by Western linguists some two millennia later.

In the Middle East, the Persian linguist Sibawayh made a detailed

and professional description of Arabic in 760 CE in his monumental work,

Al-kitab fi al-nahw (الكتاب في النحو, The Book on Grammar), bringing many

linguistic aspects of language to light. In his book he distinguished phonetics

from phonology.

Later in the West, the success of science, mathematics, and other formal systems in

the 20th century led many to attempt a formalization of the study of language as a "semantic

code". This resulted in the academic discipline of linguistics, the founding of which is

attributed to Ferdinand de Saussure.

Where do Wittgenstein and Quine argue this? Philosophers such as [[Ludwig

Wittgenstein]], W. V. Quine, and Jacques Derrida have disputed the possibility of such a

rigorous study of language by questioning many of the assumptions necessary for such a study,

and have put forth their own views on the nature of language. There is no end in sight to this

debate.

Language taxonomy

The classification of natural languages can be performed on the

basis of different underlying principles (different closeness notions, respecting different

properties and relations between languages); important directions of present classifications are:

  • paying attention to the historical evolution of languages results in a genetic classification of

languages—which is based on genetic relatedness of languages,

  • paying attention to the internal structure of languages (grammar) results in a typological

classification of languages—which is based on similarity of one or more components of

the language's grammar across languages,

  • and respecting geographical closeness and contacts between language-speaking communities

results in areal groupings of languages.

The different classifications do not match each other and are not expected to, but the correlation

between them is an important point for many linguistic research works. (There is a

parallel to the classification of species in biological phylogenetics here: consider

monophyletic vs. polyphyletic groups of species.)

The task of genetic classification belongs to the field of historical-comparative linguistics, of

typological—to linguistic typology.

See also Taxonomy, and Taxonomic classification for the general idea of classification

and taxonomies.

Genetic classification

The world's languages have been grouped into families of languages that are believed to have

common ancestors. Some of the major families are the

Indo-European languages, the Afro-Asiatic languages,

the Austronesian languages, and the Sino-Tibetan languages.

The shared features of languages from one family can be due to shared ancestry. (Compare with

homology in biology.)

Typological classification

An example of a typological classification is the classification of languages on the basis of the

basic order of the verb, the subject and the object

in a sentence into several types: SVO, [[SOV

language|SOV]], VSO, and so on, languages. (English,

for instance, belongs to the SVO language type.)

The shared features of languages of one type (= from one typological class) may have arisen

completely independently. (Compare with analogy in biology.) Their

cooccurence might be due to the universal laws governing the structure of natural

languages—language universals.

Areal classification

The following language groupings can serve as some linguistically significant examples of areal

linguistic units, or sprachbunds: Balkan linguistic union, or the bigger group of

European languages; Caucasian languages. Although the members of each group are not

closely genetically related, there is a reason for them to share

similar features, namely: their speakers have been in contact for a long time within a common

community and the languages converged in the course of the history. These are called "[[areal

feature (linguistics)|areal feature]]s".

N.B.: one should be careful about the underlying classification principle for groups of languages

which have apparently a geographical name: besides areal linguistic units, the taxa of the

genetic classification (language families) are often given names which

themselves or parts of which refer to geographical areas.

Constructed languages

Humans have also deliberately contructed artificial languages such as

Esperanto, Lojban, Ido, Interlingua, and Klingon.

Esperanto is a well-known artificial language that was created by L. L. Zamenhof as a

compilation of various elements of different languages, and was intended to be an easy-to-learn

language for people familiar with similar languages.

See also

References

  1. Sounds of the World's Animals. Catherine N. Ball, Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University (year not specified). Retrieved on 2007-04-12.

External links

languages]

Languages]

Walls to Communication"], from Awake! magazine

Communication at The Psychology Wiki]