Moral hazard: Difference between revisions
imported>Anh Nguyen mNo edit summary |
imported>Anh Nguyen No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Moral hazard is in Economics some non observable actions or behaviours that can lead to assymetric information between market participants. It has been first been | Moral hazard is in Economics some non observable actions or behaviours that can lead to assymetric information between market participants. It has been first been analyzied in the insurance industry. Many researchers have tried to defined it. Buchanan (1964) defines it as "''every deviation from correct human behavior that may pose a problem for an insurer''". | ||
In the insurance context, it can be defined as the effect of having an insurance and insured's incentives to reduce expected losses. | |||
It arise when one market participant do not bear all the full consequence of its actions. Therefore, he will be more inclined to act with more risk or less care than otherwise. For example, if a car accident cost a person $10.000 but the insurer pays $9.500, the insured person would have less incentive to avoid the accident. | It arise when one market participant do not bear all the full consequence of its actions. Therefore, he will be more inclined to act with more risk or less care than otherwise. For example, if a car accident cost a person $10.000 but the insurer pays $9.500, the insured person would have less incentive to avoid the accident. | ||
==Moral hazard in Insurance== | |||
Basically, when completly insured, any benefit of additional precautions will accrue to the insurer rather than to the policyholder. Since insurers understand well that insurance reduces the policyholder's incentives to prevent losses, they have responded to this problem in multiple ways. In most cases, insurance will not offer full coverage. Instead, only some part of the losses will be covered by insurers. To reduce the moral hazard, insured will have to bear some risk. | |||
Another principle used in the insurance industry to mitigate the moral hazard is to rate future premium according to: | |||
* the number and gravity of losses already paid by the insurance | |||
* and to the policyholder's experience (age, habits, etc,...). | |||
Holmström (1979) and Shavell (1979) have first studied the impact of moral hazard in insurance. They demontrate that having a minimum level of losses where where there will be no coverage is optimal if policyholder's effort can mitigate loss probability. | |||
==Moral hazard in Finance== | ==Moral hazard in Finance== | ||
=> centrals banks with deposit insurance, IMF and bailout, LTCM,.. to be developped. | => centrals banks with deposit insurance, IMF and bailout, LTCM,.. to be developped. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Buchanan, J. (1964), "The Inconsistencies of the National Health Service", Institute of Economic Affairs (Occasional papers n°7), Londres. | Buchanan, J. (1964), "The Inconsistencies of the National Health Service", Institute of Economic Affairs (Occasional papers n°7), Londres. | ||
Holmstrom, B. (1979), "Moral Hazard and Observability", ''Bell Journal of Economics'', 10 :74-91 | |||
Shavell, S. (1979): Risk-sharing and Incentives in the Principal-Agent Relationship, ''Bell Journal of Economics'' 10,55-73. | |||
Revision as of 16:28, 2 December 2007
Moral hazard is in Economics some non observable actions or behaviours that can lead to assymetric information between market participants. It has been first been analyzied in the insurance industry. Many researchers have tried to defined it. Buchanan (1964) defines it as "every deviation from correct human behavior that may pose a problem for an insurer".
In the insurance context, it can be defined as the effect of having an insurance and insured's incentives to reduce expected losses.
It arise when one market participant do not bear all the full consequence of its actions. Therefore, he will be more inclined to act with more risk or less care than otherwise. For example, if a car accident cost a person $10.000 but the insurer pays $9.500, the insured person would have less incentive to avoid the accident.
Moral hazard in Insurance
Basically, when completly insured, any benefit of additional precautions will accrue to the insurer rather than to the policyholder. Since insurers understand well that insurance reduces the policyholder's incentives to prevent losses, they have responded to this problem in multiple ways. In most cases, insurance will not offer full coverage. Instead, only some part of the losses will be covered by insurers. To reduce the moral hazard, insured will have to bear some risk.
Another principle used in the insurance industry to mitigate the moral hazard is to rate future premium according to:
- the number and gravity of losses already paid by the insurance
- and to the policyholder's experience (age, habits, etc,...).
Holmström (1979) and Shavell (1979) have first studied the impact of moral hazard in insurance. They demontrate that having a minimum level of losses where where there will be no coverage is optimal if policyholder's effort can mitigate loss probability.
Moral hazard in Finance
=> centrals banks with deposit insurance, IMF and bailout, LTCM,.. to be developped.
References
Buchanan, J. (1964), "The Inconsistencies of the National Health Service", Institute of Economic Affairs (Occasional papers n°7), Londres.
Holmstrom, B. (1979), "Moral Hazard and Observability", Bell Journal of Economics, 10 :74-91
Shavell, S. (1979): Risk-sharing and Incentives in the Principal-Agent Relationship, Bell Journal of Economics 10,55-73.