Military sociology: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| title = On Killing | | title = On Killing | ||
}}</ref> which blurs into the area of [[operant conditioning]] of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress. | }}</ref> which blurs into the area of [[operant conditioning]] of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress. | ||
==The professional soldier== | |||
In almost all militaries, there is an intense bonding to members of the group. Especially in wars of the 20th and 21st century, failing in one's obligation to a fellow soldier is just as important as patriotism, religion, or other more transcendental factors. | Traditionally, there have been three components: | ||
*heroic leadership; this extends to the idea of a warrior spirit <ref>{{citation | |||
| title = In Search of the Warrior Spirit: Teaching Awareness Disciplines to the Green Berets | |||
| author = Richard Strozzi-Heckler | |||
| publisher = North Atlantic Books | edition = 3rd edition | year = 2003 | |||
| ISBN =1556434251}}</ref> | |||
*management | |||
*Technical skills | |||
with a strong shift, in recent years, to the latter two.<ref name=Baucom>{{citation | |||
| title = The Professional Soldier and the Warrior Spirit | |||
| author = Donald R. Baucom | journal = Strategic Review | date = Fall 1985 | |||
| url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/au-24/baucom.pdf}}</ref> Militaries have always had technical skills; a swordsman may spend as much time training as a fighter pilot. | |||
==Group dynamics== | |||
In almost all militaries, there is an intense bonding to members of the group.<ref name=Janowitz>{{citation | |||
| title = The Professional Soldier | |||
| author = Morris Janowitz}}</ref> Especially in wars of the 20th and 21st century, failing in one's obligation to a fellow soldier is just as important as patriotism, religion, or other more transcendental factors. | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
Revision as of 15:57, 29 June 2009
Military sociology is the study of individual and group actions when they are part of a military organization. There may be aspects that are culturally specific, such as the warrior traditions of Japanese bushido, European chivalry and Pashtun pashtunwali, but, in every society, there are specifics that deal with issues of motivation to risk life, to withstand hardship, and to have a sense of justice — or lack thereof.
Certain areas of study are interdisciplinary with military sociology, such as the study of killing, termed "killology" by Grossman,[1] which blurs into the area of operant conditioning of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress.
The professional soldier
Traditionally, there have been three components:
- heroic leadership; this extends to the idea of a warrior spirit [2]
- management
- Technical skills
with a strong shift, in recent years, to the latter two.[3] Militaries have always had technical skills; a swordsman may spend as much time training as a fighter pilot.
Group dynamics
In almost all militaries, there is an intense bonding to members of the group.[4] Especially in wars of the 20th and 21st century, failing in one's obligation to a fellow soldier is just as important as patriotism, religion, or other more transcendental factors.
References
- ↑ Ken Grossman, On Killing
- ↑ Richard Strozzi-Heckler (2003), In Search of the Warrior Spirit: Teaching Awareness Disciplines to the Green Berets (3rd edition ed.), North Atlantic Books, ISBN 1556434251
- ↑ Donald R. Baucom (Fall 1985), "The Professional Soldier and the Warrior Spirit", Strategic Review
- ↑ Morris Janowitz, The Professional Soldier