Military sociology: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: '''Military sociology''' is the study of individual and group actions when they are part of a military organization. There may be aspects that are culturally specific, such as the warrior ...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Military sociology''' is the study of individual and group actions when they are part of a military organization. There may be aspects that are culturally specific, such as the warrior traditions of [[bushido]], European [[chivalry]] and [[pashtunwali]], but, in every society, there are specifics that deal with issues of motivation to risk life, to withstand hardship, and to have a sense of [[just war theory|justice]] — or lack thereof. | '''Military sociology''' is the study of individual and group actions when they are part of a military organization. There may be aspects that are culturally specific, such as the warrior traditions of Japanese [[bushido]], European [[chivalry]] and [[Pashtun people|Pashtun]] [[pashtunwali]], but, in every society, there are specifics that deal with issues of motivation to risk life, to withstand hardship, and to have a sense of [[just war theory|justice]] — or lack thereof. | ||
Certain areas of study are interdisciplinary with military sociology, such as the study of killing, termed "killology" by Grossman, which blurs into the area of [[operant conditioning]] of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress. | Certain areas of study are interdisciplinary with military sociology, such as the study of killing, termed "killology" by Grossman,<ref name=Grossman>{{citation | ||
| author = Ken Grossman | |||
| title = On Killing | |||
}}</ref> which blurs into the area of [[operant conditioning]] of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress. | |||
In almost all militaries, there is an intense bonding to members of the group. Especially in wars of the 20th and 21st century, failing in one's obligation to a fellow soldier is just as important as patriotism, religion, or other more transcendental factors. | |||
Revision as of 15:37, 29 June 2009
Military sociology is the study of individual and group actions when they are part of a military organization. There may be aspects that are culturally specific, such as the warrior traditions of Japanese bushido, European chivalry and Pashtun pashtunwali, but, in every society, there are specifics that deal with issues of motivation to risk life, to withstand hardship, and to have a sense of justice — or lack thereof.
Certain areas of study are interdisciplinary with military sociology, such as the study of killing, termed "killology" by Grossman,[1] which blurs into the area of operant conditioning of combat skills. Others deal with the issue of selecting people who will perform well under stress.
In almost all militaries, there is an intense bonding to members of the group. Especially in wars of the 20th and 21st century, failing in one's obligation to a fellow soldier is just as important as patriotism, religion, or other more transcendental factors.
- ↑ Ken Grossman, On Killing