Military Commissions Act of 2006: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "[[" to "")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
The '''Military Commissions Act of 2006''' is a U.S. law that authorizes trial by military commissions. It was enacted to regularize some of the process of charges against persons captured and considered [[enemy combatant]]s. <ref name=PL109-366>{{citation
The '''Military Commissions Act of 2006''' is a U.S. law that authorizes trial by military commissions. It was enacted to regularize some of the process of charges against persons captured and considered enemy combatant]]s. <ref name=PL109-366>{{citation
  | url = http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl109-366.pdf
  | url = http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl109-366.pdf
  | title = Military Commissions Act of 2006}}</ref>
  | title = Military Commissions Act of 2006}}</ref>


It defines, for U.S. purposes, an "unlawful enemy combatant" "as a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the [[Taliban]], [[al-Qaeda]], or associated forces) or a person who, before, on, or after the date of
It defines, for U.S. purposes, an "unlawful enemy combatant" "as a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban]], al-Qaeda]], or associated forces) or a person who, before, on, or after the date of
the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] or another ''competent tribunal'' established under the authority of the [[President]] or the [[U.S. Secretary of Defense|Secretary of Defense]]."  ''Competent tribunal'' is a term used in Article 5 of the [[Third Geneva Convention]]. There is controversy if the tribunals defined by this Act are in full compliance with that Article.
the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] or another ''competent tribunal'' established under the authority of the President]] or the U.S. Secretary of Defense|Secretary of Defense]]."  ''Competent tribunal'' is a term used in Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention]]. There is controversy if the tribunals defined by this Act are in full compliance with that Article.


==Office of Military Commissions==
==Office of Military Commissions==
Military Commissions are under the authority of [[Susan Crawford]], a retired judge and Department of Defense attorney. Appointed by the Bush Administration, she has rejected some of its positions, specifically the military prosecution of [[Mohammed al-Qahtani]], because the evidence was tainted by [[torture]].<ref name=WaPo2009-01-14>{{citation
Military Commissions are under the authority of Susan Crawford]], a retired judge and Department of Defense attorney. Appointed by the Bush Administration, she has rejected some of its positions, specifically the military prosecution of Mohammed al-Qahtani]], because the evidence was tainted by torture]].<ref name=WaPo2009-01-14>{{citation
  | title=Detainee Tortured, Says U.S. Official: Trial Overseer Cites 'Abusive' Methods Against 9/11 Suspect
  | title=Detainee Tortured, Says U.S. Official: Trial Overseer Cites 'Abusive' Methods Against 9/11 Suspect
  | author = [[Bob Woodward]]
  | author = Bob Woodward]]
  | journal = Washington Post  
  | journal = Washington Post  
  | date = January 14, 2009
  | date = January 14, 2009
  | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011303372_pf.html}}</ref>  
  | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011303372_pf.html}}</ref>  


[[BG]] Thomas W. Hartmann, [[United States Air Force]],  had been heading the process prior to her appointment, when he was named her legal advisor. [[Captain (naval)|CAPT]] Keith J. Allred, [[United States Navy]], barred him, in mid-2008, from further participation in the hearings, ruling that he was biased toward convictions; Air Force [[COL]]  Morris D. Davis, chief prosecutor, had complained that Hartmann, according to the ''New York Times'', "interfered in the work of the military prosecution office, pushed for closed-door proceedings and pressed to rely on evidence obtained through techniques that critics call torture." <ref name=Times2008-05-10>{{citation
BG]] Thomas W. Hartmann, United States Air Force]],  had been heading the process prior to her appointment, when he was named her legal advisor. Captain (naval)|CAPT]] Keith J. Allred, United States Navy]], barred him, in mid-2008, from further participation in the hearings, ruling that he was biased toward convictions; Air Force COL]]  Morris D. Davis, chief prosecutor, had complained that Hartmann, according to the ''New York Times'', "interfered in the work of the military prosecution office, pushed for closed-door proceedings and pressed to rely on evidence obtained through techniques that critics call torture." <ref name=Times2008-05-10>{{citation
  | title = Judge Drops General From Trial of Detainee  
  | title = Judge Drops General From Trial of Detainee  
  | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/us/10gitmo.html?fta=y
  | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/us/10gitmo.html?fta=y
Line 22: Line 22:
  | author = William Glaberson}}</ref>
  | author = William Glaberson}}</ref>
==George W. Bush Administration==
==George W. Bush Administration==
In Executive Order 13440, President [[George W. Bush]] reaffirmed, in July 2007, his determination:<ref name=EO13440>{{citation
In Executive Order 13440, President George W. Bush]] reaffirmed, in July 2007, his determination:<ref name=EO13440>{{citation
  | id = Executive Order 13440  
  | id = Executive Order 13440  
  | date = July 20, 2007
  | date = July 20, 2007
  | title = Interpretation of the Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 as Applied to a Program of Detention and Interrogation Operated by the Central Intelligence Agency
  | title = Interpretation of the Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 as Applied to a Program of Detention and Interrogation Operated by the Central Intelligence Agency
  | author = [[George W. Bush]]
  | author = George W. Bush]]
  | url = http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-13440.htm
  | url = http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-13440.htm
}}</ref>  "that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 defines certain prohibitions of Common Article 3 for United States law, and it reaffirms and reinforces the authority of the President to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions." He  approved CIA programs that:<ref name=EO13440 />
}}</ref>  "that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 defines certain prohibitions of Common Article 3 for United States law, and it reaffirms and reinforces the authority of the President to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions." He  approved CIA programs that:<ref name=EO13440 />
*Do not [[torture]], as defined by 2340 of title 18USC2340 or constitute other acts defined by 18USC2441
*Do not torture]], as defined by 2340 of title 18USC2340 or constitute other acts defined by 18USC2441
*Violate the Military Commissions Act of 2006 or the [[Detainee Treatment Act]]
*Violate the Military Commissions Act of 2006 or the Detainee Treatment Act]]
*Are applied to an alien detainee, who is determined, by the [[Director of the Central Intelligence Agency]] (DCIA) "to be a member or part of or supporting Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated organizations; and [is]  likely to be in possession of information that:
*Are applied to an alien detainee, who is determined, by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency]] (DCIA) "to be a member or part of or supporting Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated organizations; and [is]  likely to be in possession of information that:
**could assist in detecting, mitigating, or preventing terrorist attacks, such as attacks within the United States or against its Armed Forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities, or against allies or other countries cooperating in the war on terror with the United States, or their armed forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities; or
**could assist in detecting, mitigating, or preventing terrorist attacks, such as attacks within the United States or against its Armed Forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities, or against allies or other countries cooperating in the war on terror with the United States, or their armed forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities; or
**could assist in locating the senior leadership of Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces"
**could assist in locating the senior leadership of Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces"
*Are determined, by the DCIA, "based upon professional advice, to be safe for use with each detainee with whom they are used
*Are determined, by the DCIA, "based upon professional advice, to be safe for use with each detainee with whom they are used
*Provide detainees in the program receive the basic necessities of life, including adequate food and water, shelter from the elements, necessary clothing, protection from extremes of heat and cold, and essential medical care.
*Provide detainees in the program receive the basic necessities of life, including adequate food and water, shelter from the elements, necessary clothing, protection from extremes of heat and cold, and essential medical care.
In July of 2006, in its ruling in [[Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]], the United States Supreme Court overturned the Presidentially authorized military commission.  The Supreme Court ruled that only the United States Congress had the authority to authorize military commissions.   
In July of 2006, in its ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]], the United States Supreme Court overturned the Presidentially authorized military commission.  The Supreme Court ruled that only the United States Congress had the authority to authorize military commissions.   
===Authorization===
===Authorization===
In the fall of 2006 the United States Congress passed the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]].  It authorized military commissions that were very similar to the Presidentially authorized military commissions.   
In the fall of 2006 the United States Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006]].  It authorized military commissions that were very similar to the Presidentially authorized military commissions.   
===Conduct of commissions===
===Conduct of commissions===
[[David Hicks]], [[Salim Ahmed Hamdan]] and [[Omar Khadr]] were the first three men to face charges before the Congressionally authorized military commissions.  Hicks arranged to plead guilty to his charges in a plea bargain in March of 2007.
David Hicks]], Salim Ahmed Hamdan]] and Omar Khadr]] were the first three men to face charges before the Congressionally authorized military commissions.  Hicks arranged to plead guilty to his charges in a plea bargain in March of 2007.


On June 4th, 2007 [[Peter Brownback]] and [[Keith Allred]], the two officers presiding over Khadr and Hamdan's military commissions threw out all the charges on jurisdictional grounds.  They ruled that since Khadr and Hamdan had only been determined to be "[[enemy combatant]]s". and that the Military Commissions Act only authorized them to try "unlawful enemy combatants", they lacked the authority to try the two men.
On June 4th, 2007 Peter Brownback]] and Keith Allred]], the two officers presiding over Khadr and Hamdan's military commissions threw out all the charges on jurisdictional grounds.  They ruled that since Khadr and Hamdan had only been determined to be "enemy combatant]]s". and that the Military Commissions Act only authorized them to try "unlawful enemy combatants", they lacked the authority to try the two men.


The Department of Defense set up a court of appeal for the military commissions, and appealed their rulings.  The court of military appeal ruled that Brownback and Allred were wrong to dismiss the charges, that they themselves had the authority to determine that Khadr and Hamdan were '''"unlawful"''' combatants.
The Department of Defense set up a court of appeal for the military commissions, and appealed their rulings.  The court of military appeal ruled that Brownback and Allred were wrong to dismiss the charges, that they themselves had the authority to determine that Khadr and Hamdan were '''"unlawful"''' combatants.
Line 49: Line 49:


==Obama Administration==
==Obama Administration==
When announcing the decision to try the five most prominent [[9/11]] suspects, Attorney General [[Eric Holder]], in November 2009, said that while [[U.S. v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al.]] would be held in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,  five other defendants would still go before military commissions.<ref name=HolderDecision>{{Citation
When announcing the decision to try the five most prominent 9/11]] suspects, Attorney General Eric Holder]], in November 2009, said that while U.S. v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al.]] would be held in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,  five other defendants would still go before military commissions.<ref name=HolderDecision>{{Citation
| publisher = Department of Justice
| publisher = Department of Justice
| author = Attorney General
| author = Attorney General

Revision as of 07:29, 18 March 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is a U.S. law that authorizes trial by military commissions. It was enacted to regularize some of the process of charges against persons captured and considered enemy combatant]]s. [1]

It defines, for U.S. purposes, an "unlawful enemy combatant" "as a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban]], al-Qaeda]], or associated forces) or a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal]] or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President]] or the U.S. Secretary of Defense|Secretary of Defense]]." Competent tribunal is a term used in Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention]]. There is controversy if the tribunals defined by this Act are in full compliance with that Article.

Office of Military Commissions

Military Commissions are under the authority of Susan Crawford]], a retired judge and Department of Defense attorney. Appointed by the Bush Administration, she has rejected some of its positions, specifically the military prosecution of Mohammed al-Qahtani]], because the evidence was tainted by torture]].[2]

BG]] Thomas W. Hartmann, United States Air Force]], had been heading the process prior to her appointment, when he was named her legal advisor. Captain (naval)|CAPT]] Keith J. Allred, United States Navy]], barred him, in mid-2008, from further participation in the hearings, ruling that he was biased toward convictions; Air Force COL]] Morris D. Davis, chief prosecutor, had complained that Hartmann, according to the New York Times, "interfered in the work of the military prosecution office, pushed for closed-door proceedings and pressed to rely on evidence obtained through techniques that critics call torture." [3]

George W. Bush Administration

In Executive Order 13440, President George W. Bush]] reaffirmed, in July 2007, his determination:[4] "that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 defines certain prohibitions of Common Article 3 for United States law, and it reaffirms and reinforces the authority of the President to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions." He approved CIA programs that:[4]

  • Do not torture]], as defined by 2340 of title 18USC2340 or constitute other acts defined by 18USC2441
  • Violate the Military Commissions Act of 2006 or the Detainee Treatment Act]]
  • Are applied to an alien detainee, who is determined, by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency]] (DCIA) "to be a member or part of or supporting Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated organizations; and [is] likely to be in possession of information that:
    • could assist in detecting, mitigating, or preventing terrorist attacks, such as attacks within the United States or against its Armed Forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities, or against allies or other countries cooperating in the war on terror with the United States, or their armed forces or other personnel, citizens, or facilities; or
    • could assist in locating the senior leadership of Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces"
  • Are determined, by the DCIA, "based upon professional advice, to be safe for use with each detainee with whom they are used
  • Provide detainees in the program receive the basic necessities of life, including adequate food and water, shelter from the elements, necessary clothing, protection from extremes of heat and cold, and essential medical care.

In July of 2006, in its ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]], the United States Supreme Court overturned the Presidentially authorized military commission. The Supreme Court ruled that only the United States Congress had the authority to authorize military commissions.

Authorization

In the fall of 2006 the United States Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006]]. It authorized military commissions that were very similar to the Presidentially authorized military commissions.

Conduct of commissions

David Hicks]], Salim Ahmed Hamdan]] and Omar Khadr]] were the first three men to face charges before the Congressionally authorized military commissions. Hicks arranged to plead guilty to his charges in a plea bargain in March of 2007.

On June 4th, 2007 Peter Brownback]] and Keith Allred]], the two officers presiding over Khadr and Hamdan's military commissions threw out all the charges on jurisdictional grounds. They ruled that since Khadr and Hamdan had only been determined to be "enemy combatant]]s". and that the Military Commissions Act only authorized them to try "unlawful enemy combatants", they lacked the authority to try the two men.

The Department of Defense set up a court of appeal for the military commissions, and appealed their rulings. The court of military appeal ruled that Brownback and Allred were wrong to dismiss the charges, that they themselves had the authority to determine that Khadr and Hamdan were "unlawful" combatants.

In October of 2007 the press learned that Khadr and Hamdam's Prosecution and Defense were communicating with the judges over e-mail over matters that would have been communicated on papers in a court of law. This new information triggered criticism that the military commissions were not measuring up to the Bush Presidency's claims that they were open and transparent.

Obama Administration

When announcing the decision to try the five most prominent 9/11]] suspects, Attorney General Eric Holder]], in November 2009, said that while U.S. v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al.]] would be held in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, five other defendants would still go before military commissions.[5] No decision on trying a number of other prisoners at Guantanamo has been announced.

References