Meyer v. Nebraska: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>James F. Perry
(start article with intro section)
 
imported>James F. Perry
(add ref to text of court decision)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


'''Meyer v. Nebraska''' was a 1923 decision of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] overturning, by a vote of 7-2, a [[Nebraska]] state law which prohibited the teaching in schools, whether private or public, of modern languages other than [[English language|English]] to any child who had not graduated from the eighth grade.
'''Meyer v. Nebraska''' <ref>[http://supreme.justia.com/us/262/390/case.html Meyer v. Nebraska] Complete text of the court decision.</ref> was a 1923 decision of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] overturning, by a vote of 7-2, a [[Nebraska]] state law which prohibited the teaching in schools, whether private or public, of modern languages other than [[English language|English]] to any child who had not graduated from the eighth grade.


The Court based its decision on the [[Due Process Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] (which states, in part, ". . . nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . ."), holding that the liberties so protected by that Clause include the right of an individual "to contract, to engage in . . . common occupations, to acquire useful knowledge", etc.
The Court based its decision on the [[Due Process Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] (which states, in part, ". . . nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . ."), holding that the liberties so protected by that Clause include the right of an individual "to contract, to engage in . . . common occupations, to acquire useful knowledge", etc.


The decision became an important milestone in the development of the doctrine of substantive due process and later served as a precedent for a constitutional right of privacy.
The decision became an important milestone in the development of the doctrine of substantive due process and later served as a precedent for a constitutional right of privacy.
==Notes==
<references/>

Revision as of 20:36, 19 July 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Meyer v. Nebraska [1] was a 1923 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning, by a vote of 7-2, a Nebraska state law which prohibited the teaching in schools, whether private or public, of modern languages other than English to any child who had not graduated from the eighth grade.

The Court based its decision on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which states, in part, ". . . nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . ."), holding that the liberties so protected by that Clause include the right of an individual "to contract, to engage in . . . common occupations, to acquire useful knowledge", etc.

The decision became an important milestone in the development of the doctrine of substantive due process and later served as a precedent for a constitutional right of privacy.

Notes

  1. Meyer v. Nebraska Complete text of the court decision.