Measurement in quantum mechanics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
imported>John R. Brews
(section outlining measurements)
Line 11: Line 11:


</ref>  
</ref>  
 
==Formulation==
Measurement in quantum mechanics satisfies these requirements:<ref name=Riggs/>:
*the wavefunction &psi; (the solution to the [[Schrödinger equation]]) is a complete description of a system
*the wavefunction evolves in time according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation
*every observable property of the system corresponds to some linear operator ''O'' with a number of [[eigenvalue]]s
*any measurement of the property ''O'' results in an eigenvalue of ''O''
*the probability that the measurement will result in the ''j''-th eigenvalue is {{nowrap|<nowiki>|</nowiki>(&psi;, &psi;<sub>j</sub>)<nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>2</sup>,}} where &psi;<sub>j</sub> corresponds to an eigenvector of ''O'' with the ''j''-th eigenvalue, and it is assumed that {{nowrap|<nowiki>|</nowiki>(&psi;, &psi;)<nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>2</sup> <nowiki>=</nowiki> 1}}.
*a repetition of the measurement results in the same eigenvalue provided the system is not further disturbed between measurements
==Paradox==
==Paradox==
The interpretation of measurement in quantum mechanics has led to a number of puzzles. The most famous illustration is [[Quantum_mechanics#The_.22Schr.C3.B6dinger.27s_Cat.22_question|Schrödinger's cat]], in which a random quantum event like a radioactive decay is set up to kill a cat in a box. In the microscopic description, the cat is described by a superposition of "alive" and "dead" possibilities, and we have the peculiar result that we are in a state of suspense until we open the box to see what has happened.<ref name=Schrödinger>
The interpretation of measurement in quantum mechanics has led to a number of puzzles. The most famous illustration is [[Quantum_mechanics#The_.22Schr.C3.B6dinger.27s_Cat.22_question|Schrödinger's cat]], in which a random quantum event like a radioactive decay is set up to kill a cat in a box. In the microscopic description, the cat is described by a superposition of "alive" and "dead" possibilities, and we have the peculiar result that we are in a state of suspense until we open the box to see what has happened.<ref name=Schrödinger>

Revision as of 11:07, 9 May 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In quantum mechanics, measurement concerns the interaction of a macroscopic measurement apparatus with an observed quantum mechanical system, and the so-called "collapse" of the wavefunction upon measurement from a superposition of possibilities to a defined state. A review can be found in Zurek,[1] and in Riggs.[2]

Formulation

Measurement in quantum mechanics satisfies these requirements:[2]:

  • the wavefunction ψ (the solution to the Schrödinger equation) is a complete description of a system
  • the wavefunction evolves in time according to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation
  • every observable property of the system corresponds to some linear operator O with a number of eigenvalues
  • any measurement of the property O results in an eigenvalue of O
  • the probability that the measurement will result in the j-th eigenvalue is |(ψ, ψj)|2, where ψj corresponds to an eigenvector of O with the j-th eigenvalue, and it is assumed that |(ψ, ψ)|2 = 1.
  • a repetition of the measurement results in the same eigenvalue provided the system is not further disturbed between measurements

Paradox

The interpretation of measurement in quantum mechanics has led to a number of puzzles. The most famous illustration is Schrödinger's cat, in which a random quantum event like a radioactive decay is set up to kill a cat in a box. In the microscopic description, the cat is described by a superposition of "alive" and "dead" possibilities, and we have the peculiar result that we are in a state of suspense until we open the box to see what has happened.[3] Is this uncertainty about us (the observers), or the state of the cat?

Notes

  1. W. Hubert Zurek (July, 2003). "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical". Rev Mod Phys vol. 75: pp. 715 ff.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Peter J. Riggs (2009). “§2.3.1 The measurement problem”, Quantum Causality: Conceptual Issues in the Causal Theory of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, pp. 31 ff. ISBN 9048124026. 
  3. Erwin Schrödinger (John D. Trimmer, translator) (Original published in German in Naturwissenschaften 1935). "The present situation in quantum mechanics; a translation of Schrödinger's "cat paradox paper"". Proc American Phil Soc vol. 124: pp. 323-388.