Measure (mathematics)

From Citizendium
Revision as of 06:28, 24 January 2007 by imported>Roland Möws (a measure isn't defined on the whole powerset)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a measure is a generalisation of the concepts length, area and volume. Thus, a measure is a function that assigns a number to certain subsets of a given set. This number is said to be the measure of the set. The basic properties of measures are copied from the concepts mentioned above, so that for instance the measure of the union of two disjoint sets should be the sum of the measures of the two sets, and the measure of the empty set should be zero.

The main motivation for the development of measures was the desire to carry out integraion of more functions than those that are integrable in the Riemann sense. To do this, measures may assign lengths or areas to sets that do not have a well-defined area in the traditional sense.

The concept of measures is important in mathematical analysis and probability theory, and is the basic concept of measure theory, which studies the properties of sigma-algebras, measures, meaurable functions and integrals.


Formal definition

Formally, a measure μ is a function defined on a sigma-algebra Σ over a set X and taking values in the extended interval [0, ∞] such that the following properties are satisfied:

  • There is a set of finite measure;
  • Countable additivity or σ-additivity: if ... is a sequence of pairwise disjoint sets in Σ, the measure of the union of all the 's is equal to the sum of the measures of each :

The triple (X,Σ,μ) is then called a measure space, and the members of Σ are called measurable sets.

Note that some authors demand that the empty set has measure zero, which is equivalent to the first property of our definition.

Properties

Several further properties can be derived from the definition of a countably additive measure.

Monotonicity

μ is monotonic: If E1 and E2 are measurable sets with E1E2 then μ(E1) ≤ μ(E2).

Measures of infinite unions of measurable sets

If E1, E2, E3, ... is a countable sequence of sets in Σ, not necessarily disjoint, then

.

If E1, E2, E3, ... are measurable sets and En is a subset of En+1 for all n, then the union of the sets En is measurable, and

.

Measures of infinite intersections of measurable sets

If E1, E2, E3, ... are measurable sets and En+1 is a subset of En for all n, then the intersection of the sets En is measurable; furthermore, if at least one of the En has finite measure, then

.

This property is false without the assumption that at least one of the En has finite measure. For instance, for each nN, let

which all have infinite measure, but the intersection is empty.

Sigma-finite measures

For more information, see: Sigma-finite measure.

A measure space (X,Σ,μ) is called finite if μ(X) is a finite real number (rather than ∞). It is called σ-finite if X can be decomposed into a countable union of measurable sets of finite measure. A set in a measure space has σ-finite measure if it is a union of sets with finite measure.

For example, the real numbers with the standard Lebesgue measure are σ-finite but not finite. Consider the closed intervals [k,k+1] for all integers k; there are countably many such intervals, each has measure 1, and their union is the entire real line. Alternatively, consider the real numbers with the counting measure, which assigns to each finite set of reals the number of points in the set. This measure space is not σ-finite, because every set with finite measure contains only finitely many points, and it would take uncountably many such sets to cover the entire real line. The σ-finite measure spaces have some very convenient properties; σ-finiteness can be compared in this respect to separability of topological spaces.

Completeness

A measurable set X is called a null set if μ(X) = 0. A subset of a null set is called a negligible set. A negligible need not be measurable, but every measurable negligible set is automatically a null set. A measure μ is called complete if every negligible set is measurable.

A measure can be extended to a complete one by considering the σ-algebra of subsets Y which differ by a negligible set from a measurable set X, that is, such that the symmetric difference of X and Y is contained in a null set. One defines μ(Y) to equal μ (X).

Examples

Some important measures are listed here.

  • The counting measure is defined by μ(S) = number of elements in S.
  • The Lebesgue measure on R is the unique complete translation-invariant measure on a σ-algebra containing the intervals in R such that μ([0,1]) = 1.
  • Circular angle measure is invariant under rotation.
  • The Haar measure for a locally compact topological group is a generalization of the Lebesgue measure and has a similar uniqueness property.
  • The zero measure is defined by μ(S) = 0 for all S.
  • Every probability space gives rise to a measure which takes the value 1 on the whole space (and therefore takes all its values in the unit interval [0,1]). Such a measure is called a probability measure. See probability axioms.
  • The Dirac measure μa (confer Dirac delta function) is given by μa(S) = χS(a), where χS is the characteristic function of S. The measure of a set is 1 if it contains the point a and 0 otherwise.

Other measures include: Borel measure, Jordan measure, Ergodic measure, Euler measure, Gauss measure, Baire measure, Radon measure.

Counterexamples

Not all subsets of Euclidean space are Lebesgue measurable; examples of such sets include the Vitali set, the Hausdorff paradox, and the Banach–Tarski paradox. The concept of non-measurability is developed further in the article on non-measurable sets.

Generalizations

For certain purposes, it is useful to have a "measure" whose values are not restricted to the non-negative reals or infinity. For instance, a countably additive set function with values in the (signed) real numbers is called a signed measure, while such a function with values in the complex numbers is called a complex measure. Measures that take values in Banach spaces have been studied extensively. A measure that takes values in the set of self-adjoint projections on a Hilbert space is called a projection-valued measure; these are used mainly in functional analysis for the spectral theorem. When it is necessary to distinguish the usual measures which take non-negative values from generalizations, the term "positive measure" is used.

Another generalization is the finitely additive measure. This is the same as a measure except that instead of requiring countable additivity we require only finite additivity. Historically, this definition was used first, but proved to be not so useful. It turns out that in general, finitely additive measures are connected with notions such as Banach limits, the dual of L and the Stone-Čech compactification. All these are linked in one way or another to the axiom of choice.

The remarkable result in integral geometry known as Hadwiger's theorem states that the space of translation-invariant, finitely additive, not-necessarily-nonnegative set functions defined on finite unions of compact convex sets in Rn consists (up to scalar multiples) of one "measure" that is "homogeneous of degree k" for each k=0,1,2,...,n, and linear combinations of those "measures". "Homogeneous of degree k" means that rescaling any set by any factor c>0 multiplies the set's "measure" by ck. The one that is homogeneous of degree n is the ordinary n-dimensional volume. The one that is homogeneous of degree n-1 is the "surface volume". The one that is homogeneous of degree 1 is a mysterious function called the "mean width", a misnomer. The one that is homogeneous of degree 0 is the Euler characteristic.

The study of von Neumann algebras is often called non-commutative measure theory, as commutative von Neumann algebras are isomorphic to L(X) for some measure space (X,Σ,μ).

See also

References

  • R. M. Dudley, 2002. Real Analysis and Probability. Cambridge University Press.
  • D. H. Fremlin, 2000. Measure Theory. Torres Fremlin.
  • Paul Halmos, 1950. Measure theory. Van Nostrand and Co.
  • M. E. Munroe, 1953. Introduction to Measure and Integration. Addison Wesley.
  • Shilov, G. E., and Gurevich, B. L., 1978. Integral, Measure, and Derivative: A Unified Approach, Richard A. Silverman, trans. Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-63519-8. Emphasizes the Daniell integral.