Martin Heidegger: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>James F. Perry
m (add subpages)
imported>James F. Perry
(Heidegger and the Nazis)
Line 6: Line 6:


Through his work ''[[Question Concerning Technology]]'' (1953), Heidegger, though his name is far from as well known, in conservation circles, as those of [[Henry David Thoreau|Thoreau]], [[John Muir|Muir]], or [[Aldo Leopold|Leopold]], can be considered one of the major theorists of the modern conservation movement. In this work, Heidegger sought what he called a "free relationship to technology" wherby mankind would neither automatically "opt for" nor automatically "opt out" of technological developments. In questioning technology, Heidegger helped lay the foundation for an ecological understanding of man's role in the world.
Through his work ''[[Question Concerning Technology]]'' (1953), Heidegger, though his name is far from as well known, in conservation circles, as those of [[Henry David Thoreau|Thoreau]], [[John Muir|Muir]], or [[Aldo Leopold|Leopold]], can be considered one of the major theorists of the modern conservation movement. In this work, Heidegger sought what he called a "free relationship to technology" wherby mankind would neither automatically "opt for" nor automatically "opt out" of technological developments. In questioning technology, Heidegger helped lay the foundation for an ecological understanding of man's role in the world.
Heidegger's reputation has been clouded owing to his involvement with [[National Socialism|Nazism]] beginning in the early 1930s while he was rector at Freiburg University. Although a post-[[World War II]] investigation held that his involvement was not of the "active" type, the controversy over the extent and nature of his support for the Nazis has not abated and has raised the question as to just how far it is possible to separate his or any individual's philosophy from his personal life.

Revision as of 22:49, 25 May 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) was a German philosopher who was one of the most important and influential philosophers of the 20th century. His magnum opus - Being and Time - was devoted to the subject of ontology, or the study of being as such and it is in this connection that he was a major influence on Jean Paul Sartre and is thus widely considered one of the founders of existentialism even though he never considered himself to be an existentialist.

Heidegger wrote books and essays on topics as varied as metaphysics, the essence of truth, art, modern science, technology, the nature of thinking, and language. But his most influential work, and that for which he is best known in the field of philosophy, is Being and Time, a massive tome in which he explores the question of being itself. Heidegger felt that western philosophy had strayed in ignoring this question while expending itslef on individual cases of being (that is, on beings rather than being itself).

Through his work Question Concerning Technology (1953), Heidegger, though his name is far from as well known, in conservation circles, as those of Thoreau, Muir, or Leopold, can be considered one of the major theorists of the modern conservation movement. In this work, Heidegger sought what he called a "free relationship to technology" wherby mankind would neither automatically "opt for" nor automatically "opt out" of technological developments. In questioning technology, Heidegger helped lay the foundation for an ecological understanding of man's role in the world.

Heidegger's reputation has been clouded owing to his involvement with Nazism beginning in the early 1930s while he was rector at Freiburg University. Although a post-World War II investigation held that his involvement was not of the "active" type, the controversy over the extent and nature of his support for the Nazis has not abated and has raised the question as to just how far it is possible to separate his or any individual's philosophy from his personal life.