High Legislative Council: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: In the Republic of Vietnam, the ''High Legislative Council''', also known as the '''High National Council''', was a Buddhist-dominated 17-member government-selecting body by Gen. [[Ngu...)
 
m (Text replacement - "head of state" to "Head of State")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In the [[Republic of Vietnam]], the ''High Legislative Council''', also known as the '''High National Council''', was a Buddhist-dominated 17-member government-selecting body by Gen. [[Nguyen Khanh]] but run by [[Duong Van Minh]],  which originally formed a government in September 1964. <ref name=Moyar>{{citation
{{subpages}}
In the [[Republic of Vietnam]], the '''High Legislative Council''', also known as the '''High National Council''', was a Buddhist-dominated 17-member government-selecting body by Gen. [[Nguyen Khanh]] but run by [[Duong Van Minh]],  which originally formed a government in September 1964. <ref name=Moyar>{{citation
  | title = Triumph Forsaken
  | title = Triumph Forsaken
  | first = Mark | last = Moyar
  | first = Mark | last = Moyar
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press | year = 2006
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press | year = 2006
}}, p. 328</ref>
}}, p. 328</ref>
Initially, it had [[Pham Khac Suu]] as head of state and [[Tran Van Huong]] as Premier and head of government.  
Initially, it had [[Pham Khac Suu]] as Head of State and [[Tran Van Huong]] as Premier and head of government.  


It was seen as neutralist. <ref name=Topmiller>{{citation
It was seen as neutralist. <ref name=Topmiller>{{citation
Line 14: Line 15:
A new Khanh group, called the "Young Turks", tried to have the Council retire all officers with 25 years of seniority, but they refused. <ref>Moyar, pp. 343-344</ref>. Khanh dissolved the council in December, arresting several members,  although he temporarily retained  Suu and Huong, dismissing them later in the month.  
A new Khanh group, called the "Young Turks", tried to have the Council retire all officers with 25 years of seniority, but they refused. <ref>Moyar, pp. 343-344</ref>. Khanh dissolved the council in December, arresting several members,  although he temporarily retained  Suu and Huong, dismissing them later in the month.  


The dismissals led to a humiliating summons to an audience, for Minh and several of the Young Turks, with U.S. Ambassador [[Maxwell Taylor]], who lectured them about inappropriate actions. Taylor then went to several groups to push the resignation of the Young Turks, which caused considerable resentment over U.S. interference and eventual pushback. The angry Khanh made contact with [[NLF]] Vice-resient Huynh Tan Phat, exploring working together for nationalist reasons, but Khanh was exiled before any real actions took place.<ref>Moyar, pp. 345-347</ref>
The dismissals led to a humiliating summons to an audience, for Minh and several of the Young Turks, with U.S. Ambassador [[Maxwell Taylor]], who lectured them about inappropriate actions. Taylor then went to several groups to push the resignation of the Young Turks, which caused considerable resentment over U.S. interference and eventual pushback. The angry Khanh made contact with [[NLF]] Vice-president [[Huynh Tan Phat]], exploring working together for nationalist reasons, but Khanh was exiled before any real actions took place.<ref>Moyar, pp. 345-347</ref>


Khanh, according to INR, created a new tension with the Buddhists that Huong had not, and also may have been approaching Hanoi much as he had accused Minh.
Khanh, according to INR, created a new tension with the Buddhists that Huong had not, and also may have been approaching Hanoi much as he had accused Minh.

Latest revision as of 16:45, 10 February 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In the Republic of Vietnam, the High Legislative Council, also known as the High National Council, was a Buddhist-dominated 17-member government-selecting body by Gen. Nguyen Khanh but run by Duong Van Minh, which originally formed a government in September 1964. [1] Initially, it had Pham Khac Suu as Head of State and Tran Van Huong as Premier and head of government.

It was seen as neutralist. [2]

A new Khanh group, called the "Young Turks", tried to have the Council retire all officers with 25 years of seniority, but they refused. [3]. Khanh dissolved the council in December, arresting several members, although he temporarily retained Suu and Huong, dismissing them later in the month.

The dismissals led to a humiliating summons to an audience, for Minh and several of the Young Turks, with U.S. Ambassador Maxwell Taylor, who lectured them about inappropriate actions. Taylor then went to several groups to push the resignation of the Young Turks, which caused considerable resentment over U.S. interference and eventual pushback. The angry Khanh made contact with NLF Vice-president Huynh Tan Phat, exploring working together for nationalist reasons, but Khanh was exiled before any real actions took place.[4]

Khanh, according to INR, created a new tension with the Buddhists that Huong had not, and also may have been approaching Hanoi much as he had accused Minh.

On January 27, 1965, Khanh took effective control of the government, removing Premier Tran Van Huong and replacing him with Oanh.

Oanh lasted a little more than two weeks, being replaced by Phan Huy Quat became Premier on February 15, replacing Oanh. Quat had been Minister of Education and Minister of Defense under Bao Dai, and was strongly affiliated with Buddhist political leader Tri Quang. Quat stayed in office until June 11, under protests from Catholics, Cao Dai and Hoa Hao. There were also accusations that the military forced them out for entertaining a neutralist solution. [5]

References

  1. Moyar, Mark (2006), Triumph Forsaken, Cambridge University Press, p. 328
  2. Topmiller, Robert J., The Lotus Unleashed: The Buddhist Peace Movement in South Vietnam, 1964-1966, University Press of Kentucky p. 28
  3. Moyar, pp. 343-344
  4. Moyar, pp. 345-347
  5. Topmiller, p. 28