Evolutionary linguistics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(intro)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(elaborate on lede)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Evolutionary linguistics''' is the branch of [[linguistics]] that concerns itself with the [[evolution of language]], i.e. the processes that led to the [[evolution]] of the [[human]] faculty of [[language]]. It is a multidisciplinary field involving [[neurolinguistics]], [[cognitive science]], [[anthropology]] and others.
'''Evolutionary linguistics''' is the branch of [[linguistics]] that concerns itself with the [[evolution of language]], i.e. the processes that led to the [[evolution]] of the [[human]] faculty of [[language]]. It is a multidisciplinary field involving [[neurolinguistics]], [[cognitive science]], [[anthropology]] and others.
Some of the core questions in evolutionary linguistics are stated on the website of the linguistics department of the University of California, Santa Barbara:<ref name=ucsblang/>
{|align="center" style="width:90%;font-size:90%;"
|
<font face="Gill Sans MT">Since spoken language does not leave any fossil record, the study of the origin and evolution of language is necessarily inferential on the basis of cross-disciplinary understanding of linguistics, neuroscience, paleoanthropology, molecular genetics, and animal cognition/communication.  Of particular significance are those hominid behaviors that cannot take place without linguistic communication. A surprising issue that rises from this cross-disciplinary research is the nature of language.
*In the continuum of the evolutionary development of human cognition and behavior adduced from the paleoanthropological records, when did hominid communication qualify as “language”?
*Would the emergence of symbolic signals mark the beginning of language?
*Was the appearance of the first symbolic signal among hominids the watershed event that led instantly to a cascade of new symbolic communicative signals within a few generations, or was the increase of symbolic signals a gradual process on an evolutionary time scale in accordance with the evolution of cognition?
*Is there a “critical mass” of symbolic communicative signals that is necessary to trigger the development of grammar?
*Did grammar emerge gradually on an evolutionary scale of time, contrary to the fast-paced emergence of grammar in pidginization and creolization?
</font>
|}
There are many others, as will become apparent in this article.
==References cited==
{{reflist3 test|refs=
<ref name=ucsblang>[http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/research/evolutionary.html Linguistics at UCSB, University of California, Santa Barbara].</ref>
}}
<hr><br>

Latest revision as of 17:38, 21 October 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Evolutionary linguistics is the branch of linguistics that concerns itself with the evolution of language, i.e. the processes that led to the evolution of the human faculty of language. It is a multidisciplinary field involving neurolinguistics, cognitive science, anthropology and others.

Some of the core questions in evolutionary linguistics are stated on the website of the linguistics department of the University of California, Santa Barbara:[1]

Since spoken language does not leave any fossil record, the study of the origin and evolution of language is necessarily inferential on the basis of cross-disciplinary understanding of linguistics, neuroscience, paleoanthropology, molecular genetics, and animal cognition/communication. Of particular significance are those hominid behaviors that cannot take place without linguistic communication. A surprising issue that rises from this cross-disciplinary research is the nature of language.

  • In the continuum of the evolutionary development of human cognition and behavior adduced from the paleoanthropological records, when did hominid communication qualify as “language”?
  • Would the emergence of symbolic signals mark the beginning of language?
  • Was the appearance of the first symbolic signal among hominids the watershed event that led instantly to a cascade of new symbolic communicative signals within a few generations, or was the increase of symbolic signals a gradual process on an evolutionary time scale in accordance with the evolution of cognition?
  • Is there a “critical mass” of symbolic communicative signals that is necessary to trigger the development of grammar?
  • Did grammar emerge gradually on an evolutionary scale of time, contrary to the fast-paced emergence of grammar in pidginization and creolization?

There are many others, as will become apparent in this article.


References cited